Hezbollah and independent for Lebanon … approaches to exclusive weapons

A delegation from “Hzza” visited the deputy head of the political council, former Minister Mahmoud Qamati, the official of Christian relations Muhammad al -Khansa, and his assistant, Dr. Abdullah Zaour, Dr. Ali Al -Daher, and Maitham Qamati, the headquarters of “independent meeting for Lebanon”, where Dr. Ravi Madayan, Dr. Bassam Al -Hashem, Hanna Ayoub, Naqiba Rendeli Jabbour, Khalil Brouman And retired dean Jamil Dagher.
Madayan stressed that “the American Tom Barak plan appears to be a new agreement with slight Lebanese amendments,” accusing Israel of rejecting the implementation of Resolution 1701, and continuing attacks, assassinations and violations, despite the commitment of the army and the resistance to the November 27, 2024 agreement and the withdrawal of the Maqqa from South Litani. He considered that Netanyahu is seeking to expand the day in the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria within the “Greater Israel” project, and exert pressure on the Lebanese government to push it to confront the headquarters under the slogan “exclusive weapon”. He stressed that building the state needs a defensive strategic formula that involves the army and the resistance together, and not the abolition of the station. Stating, indicating that some Lebanese military leaders share this opinion. He reminded that the Taif Agreement and the international laws give the Lebanese the right to bargaining the uniform. Optimization as long as Israel occupies the Shebaa Farms and the Hills of Kfarshoubia and the town of Ghajar, and deducts from the Lebanese Economic Zone. Disptures. He considered that there is an attempt to thwart the Lebanese Christian Islamic experience, and link the “Ibrahimi peace” with deals between Israel and Sunni Arab and Sunni without a role for Christians, which the Vatican had warned of since Madrid 1992. It was proposed to postpone the research on the issue of the weapon of the Maq. Undergoing external agendas. He criticized the dependence of the World Bank, the Monetary Fund and some of the conditional Gulf assistance, stressing that Lebanon needs to lift the siege and allow the flow of expatriates and aid as it happened after the July 2006 war, when the national will itself imposed itself internally and externally. On its part, it was presented, and the fever is a “Hezbollah” approach to the issue of the defense strategy and exclusive arms, stressing that the barrier extends its roots. For fifty years, there are forces of various affiliations, which makes them patriotic and Lebanese origin and identity. They emphasized the integration of the army and the resistance within one equation, and the good relationship with the leadership of the army and dialogue with the team of President Joseph Aoun, noting that “Hizbullah does not have internal enemies but rather political opponents.” They also called for the construction of a national state and the launch of a rescue movement, with the formulation of a new electoral plan based on fixed alliances with forces and figures that refuse the Israeli operation and defend the independence of the Lebanese decision and the National Security Authority.