Washington raises strong messages in a global arms race

In a move that raised many questions about the United States’ military intentions, US President Donald Trump gathered senior military commanders from around the world at a military base in Virginia, during a meeting described as sudden and mysterious, at a sensitive timing in which tensions are escalating with Russia and China, amid reports of doubling the production of American weapons and Washington’s willingness to restore influence in Central Asia, especially through Afghanistan.
Review of power and send multiple messages that Trump’s role is limited to gathering generals, but also stressed in his speech that the United States possesses the “greatest army in the world” and works to produce “the strongest fighter of the sixth generation”, in addition to sending a nuclear submarine that it described as the most deadly in the moment of a potential Russian threat. The army and strengthening the fighting spirit, and secondly for the Russians and Chinese, to warn them that the United States is ready for any military confrontation. US Secretary of War, Beit Higseth, who took over the leadership of the meeting, announced that the army is committed to “preparing for war without release”, and that any party challenging Washington will pay the price. Wall Street Journal reported that the Pentagon began to double the production of missiles four times to compensate for the great attrition as a result of the military supplies to Ukraine and Israel, and the Board of acceleration of ammunition was established to ensure compensation for the inventory gaps quickly. A more aggressive ideological orientation within the Trump administration towards the nature of the American military role.
Central Asia is the focus of the upcoming strategy. Central Asia is a pivotal point in American accounts, not only as it is a strategic area linking the East to the West through land trade routes, but also because it contains vital metal wealth in the global technology race. These moves come within the framework of Washington’s desire to restore the influence that it lost after withdrawing from Afghanistan, while China and Russia are trying to enhance their presence in rapprochement with the Taliban. The Bagram Air Force Base as an essential element in restoring American influence, with the realization that any return will face a strong bargaining from regional and international powers. The backgrounds and repercussions of sociology are confirmed by a professor of international relations at the University of Georgetown, Edmund Gharib, that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that the meeting is that It sparked widespread controversy in Washington, as the Minister of War seeks to introduce profound changes on the military establishment, including reducing the number of generals and re -focusing on the army’s striking force, in the face of what conservatives consider an internal culture that is not commensurate with an army capable of fighting major battles. Gharib pointed out that American messages are directed to both inside and outside: internally to install Trump’s image as a strong leader that rebuilds the army, And externally, to warn Moscow and Beijing about any attempts to undermine American domination. The dilemma of military attrition faces a real challenge to deplete the military stock as a result of the continuous support of Ukraine and Israel, while Russia doubles the production of tanks and missiles three times compared to the West in a society, which explains the Pentagon’s impulsion towards double the production of ammunition to ensure the readiness of any direct confrontation. The conflict is not limited to the conflict. Central Asia, as it extends to the Red Sea, the Middle East, and even the North Pole, where Russia coordinates with China, which turns any possible confrontation into a multi -geography conflict linking marine and wild paths and natural resources. American confusion and changing the balance of the major paradoxical powers lies in the fact that Trump is the one who has been withdrawing from Afghanistan previously, before describing him as historical error, which reflects a state of confusion in politics American between isolation and intervention. This led to an unprecedented Chinese-Russian rapprochement, and the Iranian dimension was joined, while India took a distance from Washington due to commercial differences and sanctions on the purchase of Russian weapons, which reshaped international alliances. The repercussions of the Middle East and the Middle East economic dimension, international attitudes on Gaza and the West Bank showed the majority of the majority of a Palestinian state and criticizing Israeli policies, which put Washington in relative isolation. The promotion of American military force is seen as partial compensation for the diplomatic retreat, to remind the world that the United States is still the main player on the international scene. Gharib asserts that the military power alone is not enough, but rather it must be translated into protecting commercial and economic interests, and controlling the corridors and maritime and land ports, which have become decisive papers in the balance of global influence. Washington’s movements show that they seek to rebuild American military power And the appearance of the appearance of the ready for confrontation, but the question remains open: Is the goal to fight an actual war, or just letters of deterrence and balance international influence? Analyzes indicate that confused policies, with economic challenges and accelerating international competition, may make the United States less able to impose its will as before, while the arms race and the re -drawing the American strategy continue to face accelerated international transformations and new balances between the major powers.