Brak and Ortugus visit in the context of the survey and Washington hides the Israeli response

Michel Nasr wrote in “Al -Diyar”: In a very sensitive timing regionally and internally, the visit of Ali Larijani and Brak – Ortigos to Beirut came to be followed by the visit of Prince Yazid Bin Farhan and Jean Eve Ludrian. The two visits did not come in isolation from the regional changes, while many believe that the visit came to revive the role of Lebanon as a field of conflict and exchange regional messages, but, for the observers, it came frustrated by Lebanese officials, despite the positive media atmosphere that the American mediator used to launch every time, when the Lebanese side was surprised, that there are no answers to the American guest on the Lebanese paper, specifically the situation The Israeli of it, what is the official Lebanon in the “Zawiya”.

The visit, which lasted for hours, in a limited meetings table, carried a form more than one message for the Lebanese interior, especially since the decision of Morgan Ortigos came to a construction of a direct recommendation from Foreign Minister Mark Rubio, which raised “Naqza” among the officials in Lebanon, especially since no one was unable to decipher the symbols and gas that participation, amid a torrent of conflicting data. Lebanese follow -up was established after the recent government’s move, as the American administration found many vague matters that need clarification, especially in light of the official positions that “raise doubts” about the limits of going to implement decisions and setting red lines.
The sources pointed out that the American delegates, in detail about many points and items, without obtaining the entire answers, specifically, what is in the event of lack of success in commitment to the leous, and the lack of conviction Physical, logistical and human to do this task.
The sources revealed that the two guests will return at the beginning of September on a second visit, after the army’s plan was completed, and the white thread of the black was found, while the ongoing contacts with Hizbullah through more than one channel, especially since there is a talk about the Gulf state entering the communication line to bring the views and find a compromise.
For its part, diplomatic circles in keeping with the visit affirmed that until now, things are still in theoretical framework, and therefore there are no practical steps for the “breaking siege”, whether for the process of age or economic support.
The circles confirmed that the American side, “the district”, to the existence of an Israeli position until the hour, is not concerned with the Lebanese decision. Therefore, Tel Aviv is continuing in its strategy, from biting the Lebanese lands along the border, leading to the continuation of its land and air military operations, according to what its interest requires, which Barak informs during his meeting with the Minister of Israeli Strategic Affairs Ron Derbervi Paris, confirming that Washington has not been exerted by any pressure on Israel, and that its position is still at the limits of playing the role of the mediator between Beirut and Tel Aviv, which was re -confirmed.
The circles indicated that the file seems more complicated than the Lebanese people see, because the three parties concerned with the agreement are unwilling until now by sitting to one table, and therefore the shuttle diplomacy between the three capitals Beirut, Tel Aviv and Damascus may take its time, which raises the risks from the possibility of developments that may overthrow the agreement from its foundations.
On the fate of the international emergency forces, the circles confirmed that the American position is still the same, in terms of stopping the financing of the United Nations forces in southern Lebanon, and this was included in the budget that was referred to Congress, but Washington expressed some softness in terms of not using the vet French endeavors to secure alternative financing have not succeeded.