Abdullah takes aim at the “Legal Agenda” and describes its speech as a “linguistic and literary lapse.”

Member of the “Democratic Gathering,” MP Bilal Abdullah, denounced the “Legal Agenda” platform’s use of the term “absorption” to describe “the law protecting the doctor’s practice of his profession,” considering this expression “a lapse in both literature and language,” despite his acknowledgment of the institution’s constitutional right to express an opinion and criticize legislation issued by Parliament.

In a tweet posted on his account on the “X” platform, Abdullah criticized what he described as the behavior of the “Legal Agenda,” which “repeatedly allows itself to evaluate and criticize the laws approved by the Parliament, considering itself a legislative authority authorized to express an opinion on this or that law, and this is a right protected by the Constitution,” adding, “As for using the expression of a word that misrepresents the law protecting the doctor’s practice in his profession, it is a lapse in both literature and language.”

These positions come against the backdrop of the proposal presented by the “Legal Agenda” in objection to the aforementioned law, which prompted Representative Abdullah to clearly separate the constitutional legitimacy of the right to criticize and evaluate laws, and the level of discourse and language used to express those positions.