November 14, 2026

Dar Al-Iftaa resolves the controversy and officially responds to the involvement of the Mufti’s son in the investigations

The media office at Dar Al-Iftaa in Baalbek-Hermel issued an official statement, against the backdrop of controversy and leaks circulating regarding a judicial file in which the name of Adam, the son of the mufti of the region, was mentioned. The statement affirmed full respect for the Lebanese judiciary and its independence, while categorically rejecting the use of the Mufti’s name or religious position to cover up any legal violation.

The office explained that the Mufti remained silent throughout the past period out of respect for the confidentiality of investigations and the prestige of the judiciary, and to avoid any interpretation that might be considered interference in the course of justice. The statement indicated that the entire case was placed in the custody of the competent judiciary and the security services, while expressing full confidence in their ability to uncover the complete truth.

The statement stressed the principle of the rule of law, stressing that “no one is above the law,” and that the Fatwa House does not provide cover for anyone, nor does it accept the exploitation of its position in any private or public affairs. He added that responsibility is personal and individual, and anyone whose involvement is proven by a fair judicial ruling in any legal transgression alone bears the consequences of his actions.

In the same context, the statement recalled the right of any citizen to the presumption of innocence and the necessity of providing means of self-defense, warning at the same time against defamation campaigns and media trials that pre-empt investigations. He called for respecting the privacy of the judicial process and not interfering with its procedures, including prohibiting photocopying of court records.

In conclusion, the media office of Dar Al-Iftaa called on the media to be accurate and objective, and to refrain from issuing prejudices that affect the dignity of individuals and institutions, stressing that the official results of investigations remain the only reference for determining facts and responsibilities.