Intimate tattoos, unraveling the mystery.. Brigadier General Dr. Fouad Al-Khoury opens the investigation files: Al-Khabit confessed to crimes they did not commit

Telegram     WhatsApp

Intimate tattoos, unraveling the mystery.. Brigadier General Dr. Fouad Al-Khoury opens the investigation files: Al-Khabit confessed to crimes they did not commit

A witness entered the investigation…

Minutes later, he became a suspect.

His statement has not changed.
No new evidence has emerged.
It did not fall by contradiction.

What changed… was the investigator’s look at him.

the reason?

Small tattoo on his body.

A detail may open a clue to a crime, a gang, a hidden identity or relationship…
The entire investigation may be conducted behind a false hypothesis.

So when does a tattoo become a key to investigation?
When does it turn into a trap that might put an innocent person under suspicion?

Brigadier Dr. Fouad Al-Khoury, lecturer and head of the Research and Strategic Studies Committee at the Center for Loyalty to the Homeland, opened in “File 101” via “Red TV”, a file that goes beyond the traditional question: What do tattoos mean?

To put it in its most dangerous context:

Can the investigator read the crime from the human body… without falling into the trap of criminal profiling and prejudgment?

Al-Khoury, a former officer in the Internal Security Forces who served about 14 years in the judicial police and in 2002 followed an investigation course at the FBI National Academy, returns to files and investigations that he dealt with himself.

Murder inside a house.
Armed robbery.
A tattoo on a suspect’s neck.
A hidden sign in a case of assault on two children.
Databases document the identifying marks and tattoos of detainees.

In some of these files, tattoos were not evidence…

But it was the indicator that changed the direction of the investigation.

This is where the most dangerous area begins.

The skull, the tear under the eye, the weapon, the snake, the stars, the spider’s web, and religious or gang symbols may carry certain connotations…

But what happens when the investigator reads it wrong?

Is it possible for a single impression to creep into the investigation report, turning suspicion into a “fact” that has never been proven?

Al-Khoury warns of a “terrible mistake” that the investigator may make, separates the indicator, the evidence, and the confession, and reveals why even the suspect’s confession is not always enough to close the file.

On the other hand, it opens the file of tattoos inside prisons, the codes of gangs and mafias, and ranks and symbols that may reveal affiliation, in addition to criminal profiling, behavioral profiles, and reading body language during the investigation.

Is everyone with a teardrop tattoo a killer?
Do many tattoos reveal an aggressive personality?
How do organized gangs use tattoos as a secret identity?
Can police identify a suspect by a mark on his body?
When does a tattoo become part of the criminal profile?

How did a tattoo on a man’s neck lead to narrowing the investigation into an armed robbery?
What did he reveal about a physical detail that only the victim and the attacker were supposed to know?
Can a witness enter the investigation…and emerge as a suspect because of his tattoo?

Where does the science of criminal investigation end…
And the illusion begins?

In an investigation, the most serious errors are not always in evidence that the investigator did not see…
But sometimes in the sense that he saw in something that was not evidence at all.
Because the most difficult thing in the investigation is not to discover the meaning of the symbol…
Rather, you must prove that the meaning you discovered is the truth.