The Lebanese are enough slogans that constitute plots lined on the army

Nabil Bou Moncef wrote in “Al -Nahar”: The legitimate political authority is invited to take the lessons that dig deep in the experiences of Lebanon and its crises, when it is approved on the plan of the leadership of the Lebanese army, which is to withdraw, assemble, remove, remove, remove, and assemble, especially from it specifically the “Hezbollah” weapon, which formed for more than three decades one of the largest barriers in front of the unilateral weapons of the Lebanese army and its exclusivity, but rather the arms of the state and its arms. And peace.

What must be remembered on the political authority on the one hand and the Shiite duo team that rejects the decision to exclusively arms in the hands of the state on the other hand, that Lebanon’s permissibility of the war in its parts, the civil war and the war of others on the land of Lebanon, as well At that time, there are concerns about the Palestinians from Lebanese parties that exceeded the importance of burying sedition in its cradle. The frequency of refusing to deploy the army to suppress the weapons remained opposed until the entire Lebanon exploded, and then the army was divided after its shell.
Of course, the internal and external circumstances differed, and the army is now the institution, which is not internally and externally, comparable to the view, the hopes and the aspirations attached to it. The Lebanese were sufficient for triads, quarrels, and slogans that were plots of plots of the army.