The responsibility of Hezbollah is to be convinced that the state is a protector for everyone

David Ramal wrote in “Calling of the homeland”: The danger is increasing with the diplomatic data circulating about Israel’s rejection of the American paper that was recently proposed as a framework for the solution, and the presence of a tendency for Netanyahu to expand the patch of the Israeli operation in some Lebanese regions. The most dangerous is that the scenarios offered are not limited to the south alone, but also the possibility of Israel resorting to the operations of Komondos in the Bekaa region, similar to what it is implementing in Syria, so that it targets facilities or weapons stores for “Hizbulb”. This brings to mind the era of the eighties, when Israel kidnapped Lebanese leaders such as Abu Ali Al -Dirani and Sheikh Abdul Karim Obaid, in steps that were aimed at confusing the internal reality and changing the balance of power.
The threat is not limited to this extent, but rather to the possibility of Israel’s expansion in the Jabal Sheikh region, as it works to strengthen its military positions and open new roads that facilitate the penetration towards the Lebanese interior. In the event that this scenario is achieved, Lebanon will find itself in front of a very dangerous equation, which is an occupation in the south and another occupation in the Bekaa, which means a comprehensive confusion of military and political papers, and a bombing of the equivalent equation of stability, and perhaps the introduction of Lebanon in a more complex stage than the recent Israeli war. The axioms, to reach the level of a coherent national equation fee that fortified the interior and prevents Israel from exploiting any rift. The decision must be entirely Lebanese, and to be built on a real partnership between all components, because any violation of this rule will make the Lebanese scene an open theater in front of external projects that see in Lebanon only an arena to liquidate accounts, and here lies the responsibility of “Hizbullah” in the conviction that the solution is that the state in its institutions is the protector of all, and that everyone is on an equal footing under the roof of the constitution and the law.