Aoun and the weapon: The party will eventually come to the state

Tony Issa wrote in “Al -Gomhoria” completely a month ago, people stopped applause for the help and peace that they had taken bold decisions on August 5 and 7. On September 5, disappointment began to conquer them when the decisions of the cabinet came, loose, contradictory and say everything at the same time. Many described these decisions as “scandal”. A number of political forces at home and from the countries concerned with the Lebanese situation expressed disappointment. A few days ago, while everyone is waiting for what the army will say in the first month’s report on the weapon, the story of Al -Raouche came to raise more doubts about the seriousness of the state. In summary, many of those who bet that Aoun will adhere to the department’s speech and will work to limit the weapon to the army without anyone else, and they found that he gave excuses for “Hizbullah” in “Al -Tarkhah and the challenge of the state, from the issue of the weapon that the” party “will defend” Karbala “as its Secretary -General Sheikh Naim Qasim said to the lights of Al -Rousha, then he launched a dialogue with President Nabih Berri, Political. In this climate, the new executive authority front, on which the wager was held to build the state, seemed to be disintegrated because of Aoun’s choice to be placed in a terrace near the “party”.

This talk is heard a lot these days, and even heard his ears while he was in New York participating in the United Nations meetings, and holds meetings on its margins, most notably with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, known for his strict stances on the issue of Hizbullah and its role in Lebanon.
Those familiar with Aoun’s position fully refuse to accuse him of indolence at the expense of the state, and they say that the rulings that they call are not based on a logical basis, but rather they are merely guesses, and are based on old fears of the return of the clock back in Lebanon, that is, a return to an equation in which the state and its institutions are weak and helpless. But these concerns, as these people say, are not based on any basis. And the path of the state that was launched will not stop anything or anyone. In this sense, Aoun and the Prime Minister are committed to him from the concern for the state and institutions, and adhere to the inventory of weapons in its hands. But the difference lies only in style, and in adopting the best tactic to reach the goal.
Supporters of Aoun say: Was Rubio describing his meeting with Aoun with positive if the President’s position was ambiguous to the issue of disarmament and restricting it to the state? Did the Americans follow this position by translating a practical by providing the army and security forces of $ 230 million in the context of seeking to disarm Hizbullah? In fact, Aoun’s position, according to these people, is based on the conviction that pragmatism is the safest to reach the goal, given the sharp complications that surround the file. There is an international understanding of this approach. The party will be convinced on its own that the circumstances that he reached, due to its ignition of the war of support and its forced to sign the ceasefire agreement in November of last year, will require it, satisfied with the face of the facts and observance of the variables. In the end, he will give up his weapon to the state as long as this is an international demand. As the “party” agreed to sign a document in which it abandons its weapons to the state, due to the military and political pressures, it will be obligated to fulfill its signature as long as these pressures exist and a candidate for escalation. The role of the state will be custody of the party, as well as custody of all groups and components in Lebanon. There is no room for dealing with maliciousness, revenge or challenges between the Lebanese. Therefore, the cloud of tension in the relations between Aoun and Salam will cross quickly, and if those affected by their consensus try to try to destroy fire between them in politics or the media, and in fact it is said that the “party” does not care about the alliance with any of the two men, and that its campaigns on Aoun have not stopped for years. All he wants is to take advantage of the opportunity to contradict the front of the ruling to increase its breadth and relax. It is a “fingers” game. And both parties to the confrontation around the weapon are betting that the other will cry first. As for Aoun, it bets that «the party will eventually come to the state. When the fish is attached to the hook, the hunter does not venture to tighten the thread in its direction quickly and one batch, because it may be cut off and everything is lost. Rather, he is repeating it a little in his direction, and then relaxes it in a lower amount. In the end, the fish finds itself inside the basket.
A senior political source revealed to “Kuwaiti News” that “the last meeting that the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam in Baabda Palace, was a basic station to open and reveal about the course of matters since the government began its constitutional duties to the recent problem known as the” Raouchea incident. ” The meeting turns into an occasion to clarify the positions and rearrange the priorities, in a way that establishes the relationship between the two presidencies in light of the obsessive challenges. However, what was found from the dialogue is that harmony is based on the foundations and constants that are based on the discourse of the department on the one hand and the ministerial statement on the other hand, while the problem is only in the method of treatment and the way of managing issues, and this is a difference that does not affect the essence but rather expresses a variation in performance and approach. It is issued in one language. It can be emphasized that this summary constitutes a safety valve in a decisive stage that Lebanon is going through, and the continuation of the institutional partnership between Baabda and the Saraya requires cohesion and balance that prevents any political or institutional confusion. ” Rather, the situation was quickly contained. The religious references also played a fundamental and silent role in calming the atmosphere and controlling the street, and this contributed to protecting stability and dedicating the commitment to the spirit of the Taif Agreement and its text as a guarantor framework for national unity.