What if Washington fails to pressure Tel Aviv?

From the first moment of the government’s announcement of its welcome to the plan, which was prepared by the army leadership to implement the principle of exclusive weapons in the hands of the legitimate Lebanese powers, and until the date of the presentation of the “Yarzeh” first statement on the outcome of what has been implemented in the first stage of the plan and is limited to the southern region located south of the Litani River, the effects of the word “welcome” will remain, which is the adjective of “plague” for the word “declaration” Political circles, against the background of the government’s adherence to most of its political components to “achieve security and stability on its southern borders, extend the sovereignty of the state over its entire lands with its own forces, and made the decision of war and peace in the custody of the Lebanese constitutional institutions” on the one hand, and the insistence of “Hizbullah” on the other hand to act as if this “decision – sin” was not as long as Israel continued in its daily attacks, From the hills, which are still occupying it, hitting the wall width any decision that has to do with the extraction of its weapon in any way.

If the “Shiite duo” ministers did not withdraw from the September 5 session, and listened to the detailed explanation, presented by the commander of the army, General Rodolph Haykal, who is related to the details of the state restoration plan, its sovereign rights over the entire 10452 square kilometers, and participated in discussing the content of the “welcome statement” of this plan, they would have realized that what in this statement was to download the Israeli. The responsibility not to implement international resolution No. 1701 as “the legal framework guaranteeing the protection of Lebanese sovereignty, and preventing repeated Israeli attacks”, expresses in a manner responsible for the concerns of the incubating environment for “Hizbullah”, while emphasizing it on “the full, non -fragmented, and multi -party implementation of the agreement to stop the hostilities, represents the practical mechanism to implement the aforementioned UN resolution.”
Were it not for this decision -making in the province by the party’s leadership in Haret Hreik for reasons that may be related to what links the political decision of the southern suburb to the political and strategic decision related to the indirect negotiation agenda between Tehran and Washington, the government’s statement resorted to the most severe at the international level and the most influential in terms of positive pressure on the American administration in order to exercise its maximum pressure and persuasion. The AD government must impose what is compatible with the US President’s view of public stability in the region, including Lebanon, even though he decided to transfer the US Department of Defense into the Ministry of War along the lines of what Israel did for many years.
So Lebanon threw the ball to the Israel Stadium, “which bear clear obligations under Resolution 1701 and the agreement to stop hostilities, but its continuation in violations is evidence of its dispossession of these obligations, and exposes the regional security and stability to serious risks.”
The American delegate Thomas Barak, “was based in essence on two basic principles: the first of which correlates and coincides with the steps from all parties as a guarantee of good intentions and safety of implementation, and the second is that its penetration is conditional on the approval of both Lebanon, Israel and Syria on the obligations of each of them.” Lebanon, who agreed to the goals that came in this paper on August 7 is the only one who committed these principles while Israel remained insisting on not adhering to any agreement or any paper, and also insist on achieving the goals, which meet with its expansion project and with its historical ambitions in Lebanon.
From here comes the role of the United States of America, which must play it with all seriousness and responsibility and exert the maximum pressure on Tel Aviv in order to go what the American paper included before talking about the need to adhere to the grades of Resolution 1701 in terms of stopping its continuous attacks on the goals, which it considers hostile to it, and the start of its gradual withdrawal in conjunction with the advanced steps that the army achieves in the field of its implementation of the plan, which the government welcomed It was fully approved according to the appropriate timetable, in its first stage, which has an exclusive relationship with the area south of the Litani River, which will become free of any illegal weapon within a month from now.
But if Washington fails to pressure the Netanyahu government, things are going in the opposite direction of what Lebanon wants and seeks through the advanced steps taken on August 5 and 7 and on September 5, and Israel may return the clock to before November 27 of last year, especially with the approaching the first anniversary of the assassination of the former Secretary -General of “Hezbollah” Sayyid Hassan.