The forces to Naim Qasim: If it were not for Hizbul

The statement added: “Sheikh Naim called on the government to hold sessions to discuss how to restore sovereignty, while the decisions taken by the government on 5 and 7 have already opened the way for the restoration of the violated sovereignty from the“ Hizbullah ”weapon, which confiscated the strategic decision of the state, preventing the establishment of an actual state, and dragging Lebanon to wars based on its interests and the interests of Iran.
Sheikh Naim thinks that by focusing on the slogan “sovereignty” is able to moderate meanings and delude the Lebanese that his party defends sovereignty, while the concept of sovereignty is clear and intuitive, which is that the state monopolizes the power and decision, and therefore who violates Lebanese sovereignty is “Hizbul”, and because of it Israel entered Lebanon and violated its sovereignty, and what the government decided on 5 and 7 August is the first step on the path of restoring sovereignty. : “Sheikh Naim claimed that if it were not for the station. Including Israel would have reached the capital, Beirut,” while the truth was that had it not been for “Hezbollah”, Israel would not have entered Lebanon in July 2006, and without it it would not have returned and entered Lebanon after his declaration of the war of chain of transmission, and had it not been for the armistice agreement stipulated by the Taif Agreement governing the relationship between the two countries, and Israel would have stood at the international border recognized in Lebanon.
He said that the battle of the dawn of Al -Jaraud is the model on the relationship between the army and the so -called Al -Maqaqa, while the real model is to decipher the Iranian arm by the Lebanese army, which has the confidence of all Lebanese, and has capabilities that exceeded the capabilities of the so -called resistance, which was never a supporter of the army, but it was always a faction of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and the Lebanese army does not want a role, nor the Lebanese state. Sheikh Naim: “What is your alternative if you do not continue to bargain, is it surrender to Israel?” The truth is that those who delivered Lebanon to Israel is this place. The same bargain that it has repeatedly introduced to Lebanon, and granted it the right to military control and targeting the members of the party and its locations whenever it wants, and from the delivery of Lebanon to Israel he is the one who claimed and claims its ability to confront it, while the reality is proven the opposite, because it was the one who destroyed Lebanon and displaced its people. The truth is that the clearest and honorable decision taken by the government is with illegal disarmament, which in the past thirty years has kept a chaos, wars, death, destruction and ruin. Qasim said that “the government decision is not a charter, and was taken under American and Israeli dictates.” And Muslims. As for what he calls dictates, it is nothing but an explicit application of the constitution on which Hezbollah has turned around 35 years ago. But the government made its decision, and the decision will be implemented, and its implementation constitutes an interest for Lebanon and all the Lebanese, and when the state attends and falls any other okay. He declared his rejection of the principle of step in exchange for a step, as if he is the state and the decision -maker, while the government alone is the right to approval or rejection. The Lebanese, and its Iranian reference does not stop interfering in the affairs of Lebanon, the most recent of which was issued by the coordination official in the Revolutionary Guards ’Corps, Irj Mesjidi, that the so -called“ bargaining and its weapon is a red line that will not affect ”, but the real red line is Lebanon, and it is forbidden for Iran to touch this line. She must take care of its affairs, while Lebanon knows its affairs.