What did he want to say, Hezbollah from the rock of Al -Raouche?

Two, whether in Lebanon or in other neighboring countries, do not disagree that what was suffered by “Hizbullah” with the martyrdom of the two former years of the two years, Hassan Nass.
The insistence of “Hizbullah” on the lack of commitment to the circular issued by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and his insistence on lighting the Raouche Rock with the pictures of the two martyrs. Government in sessions 5 and 7 August and in the September 5 session, which all the ministers of the “Shiite duo” boycotted. This occasion came to give up in the field in front of “Hizbulb” to direct more than one lighting message to all parties at home and abroad, and that it still exists, strongly, on the political scene, and that he is able to reject what he deems inappropriate with his general policies, especially in what has a relationship With his weapon, Hizbul: Hezbollah’s insistence on lighting the rock of Al -Raouche, which is one of the most prominent national natural symbols in the capital, Beirut, cannot be separated from the symbolic and deep political dimension of this step. The place in itself is not just a tourist landmark, but rather a picture of the capital and the direction of Lebanon in front of the world. Here lies the importance of the messages that the “party” wanted to send to the Lebanese interior and to abroad.
The message that he wanted to direct to the Lebanese interior is based on the following: First, he wanted to say that his political and public presence is not limited to the southern suburbs of Beirut, the south or the Bekaa, but rather extends to the heart of the capital and to its national symbolism, meaning that he wanted to say that it is an integral part of the Lebanese public scene. As for the second message, it is directed at the same time to his political opponents: to tell them that he is able to put his mark in any universal symbolic space, and that he is not a party confined to a specific environment. As for third, it is an indirect challenge message that he exists where he wants, and that he is a partner, but rather a courage in the national scene, even in Beirut landmarks related to the identity of the state. The Shiite “remains in the government, but their political and developmental” battle “will be long and difficult in the face of all those who will try to” domesticate the party “and trim its nails by means that only serve the interest of Israel. It is not just an armed force linked to the resistance, but also a force capable of investing in cultural and tourism symbolism, that is, providing a soft image to external public opinion. From here it is possible to understand the message that Sheikh Naim Qasim directed to Saudi Arabia. He wanted to suggest that it is possible to read the step as an attempt to show that the party does not contradict Lebanon’s civilizational image, but is able to identify with it, and perhaps re -drafting it according to its vision. Second, it is a reference to the international community that, despite its classification in many countries as an armed organization, it has the ability to address people In the deeper symbolic dimension of this step, it is: First, the rock of Raouche in the Lebanese conscience means steadfastness in the face of the sea, that is, in the face of storms. And what it was lit by “Hizbullah” is nothing but suggestion that it connects itself in this way: a fixed, firm and disobedient force on the refraction. Second, it is a message that he is present in the “most open place to the world”, that is, Beirut, to say that it is not limited to local geography, but overlooks the international space. In short, the lighting of the Rawsha Rock by “Hizbullah” is not just a festive action. Rather, it is a symbolic political position, which is to establish its political and popular presence in the heart of the capital, that is, generalizing the devotion of the image of steadfastness, and sending dual messages to the inside and outside that the party is part of the Lebanese identity as much as it is the power of the compromise. The government will be longer than some believe, and it will not stop at the next parliamentary election threshold.