Official confusion after the new American position and watching the outcome of Aoun Etisalat

Political interest is distributed between New York, as the President of the Republic, Joseph Aoun, continued his meetings with the leaders of the state and the heads of the delegation participating in the United Nations General Assembly, and between Beirut, which today witnessed the events of the activities of a year’s passage on the consultation of. 17 items, but without proposing a law about 60 deputies related to the vote of expatriates to 128 deputies instead of voting for six deputies.
Al -Nahar wrote: The concerned circles are awaiting the return of President Aoun from New York to find out the reality of the data behind the American position, which the President of the Republic is likely to circulate through the declared and unannounced contacts that were made with him in New York, knowing that his statements and speech before the United Nations carried the direct and indirect response to accusing the Lebanese authorities of not implementing their obligations. The circles themselves do not hide that the atmosphere of the fears that Burke’s speech spread raised a lot of discomfort with the pillars of the authority, especially since it seemed on a side of it as if it was a coverage of any new extensive Israeli aggression against Lebanon, and this caused in recent days with a “mobilization” of civil in several areas of the south and the suburb and the Iqbal movement is remarkable for renting homes in areas of Beirut and Mount Lebanon in anticipation of possible military developments. New. Informed political sources stopped for the “brigade” at the importance of the meetings held by the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun in New York, which reflected Lebanon’s steadfast position on several issues, especially with regard to the exclusive arms in the hands of the state, and said that the President of the Republic spoke explicitly about the presence of obstacles to completing the implementation of this procedure and the most prominent of which is Israel’s continued attacks.
The sources pointed out that what President Aoun is waiting for upon his return from New York to follow this file and other files, especially with regard to Lebanon’s support, and she saw that he would complete his contacts in this context after his speech at the United Nations General Assembly drew a framework for peace and the role of the United Nations in this context.
Follow -up sources indicated to the “Call of the Homeland” that despite the attempt to absorb Tom Barak’s position on the issue of the state’s dealings with weapons, he left confusion among the pillars of Lebanese rule, and his words can only be taken seriously, while the time and options narrowed in front of the Lebanese state. The sources pointed out that “Hizbah” does not leave a window, even a small window, in order to resolve and remove the specter of war, and a failure of all President Nabih Berri’s attempts to soften the position of the “party” and pushed him to make concessions even formalities. The sources confirmed that everyone is awaiting the return of President Aoun from New York to know how to deal with the new American position, while Aoun’s meeting with Rubio focused on generalities and did not enter into the details as Barak did and as Ortigos does, but Aoun’s return will reveal the American and international position of everything that happens to build on the required thing.
And the American prominent, what US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in New York: “We will support Lebanon to overcome its economic crisis, and the Lebanese government continues to oppose Iran’s policies.”
It is worth noting that Rubio met President Joseph Aoun. It was learned that the atmosphere of the meeting was positive and Aoun asked Rubio to help his country to pressure Israel to withdraw from the points.
The information indicated that Aoun talked about the inventory of weapons in all of Lebanon and not only in the south, and explained to Rubio the obstacles facing the army, as well as explaining the issue of the army’s plan and reforms, and Aoun talked about the government’s work and that it has done many works in this field and the situation needs to be followed up, but the first and basic obsession remains the security of the south because it affects all of Lebanon, Rubio assured the army’s support and follow -up of matters, and the president came out with a positive impression of the meeting. On the other hand, Aoun talked about the Lebanese economic situation and the reconstruction file and supporting the reconstruction plan, so Rubio promised him to follow up and confirmed Lebanon’s economically. Al -Banaa mentioned that Lebanese political and diplomatic references conducted a series of contacts with US officials to clarify the reality of Barak’s position and whether it reflects the directions of the American administration towards Lebanon in the next stage, and how it will be reflected on the southern front, the Israeli withdrawal and the application of the ceasefire agreement In addition to the army’s exclusive plan in the hands of the state, reforms and conferences of supporting Lebanon, especially since Barak’s upscale statements contradict the statements of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and what was quoted during the United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York, where he did not launch any similar statement to Barak’s statements, as his words were limited in a statement yesterday that his country “will support Lebanon to overcome its economic crisis”, adding: “The Lebanese government continues its opposition policies. Iran. ”
Sources familiar with the American position pointed out that what Barak said reflects the truth of the American intentions and a hostile view of Hezbollah and Iran and everyone who faces “Israel” and opposes and opposes American projects in the region, but not necessarily that it translates into policies and trends on the ground, especially since Lebanon is based on those who are familiar with some of the deep state institutions in the United States, not an American priority at the present time under the success of the last war in Balat Hezbollah and its weakening and the installation of political authority against the party and coordinated with the Americans, and thus turned the American attention to Syria, which has become priority and Lebanon attached to it, but this does not mean that Lebanon is not in the circle of American interest because it is an essential American window on the Mediterranean that it uses politically, logistically, militarily and security in applying its policies and plans in the region.
The sources pointed out that the Americans know that the army cannot implement the government’s plan to limit weapons in light of its current capabilities and capabilities and in the accurate and complex Lebanese composition, and this is what the Pentagon admitted, who directly oversees the Lebanese army’s situation and its work in southern Litani, its armament and its support, and the September 5 resolution, which reflected the government’s retreat from the decisions of 5 and 7 August to translate the evaluation of the US Department of Defense to put the army. The sources added that Barak’s position expresses the position of the most supportive wing for “Israel” in the United States, but it is not necessarily the same as the position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. But most importantly, how is Barak’s position translated into American policies and trends towards Lebanon, and how will “Israel” read it? How will you translate it on the ground?
A European diplomatic source said that the current indicators do not indicate an imminent Israeli war on Lebanon with the continuation of air military operations and the survival of the Israeli forces in the south, but the expansion of military operations to the level of a comprehensive war on Lebanon needs an American decision, capabilities, military and armament, and devoted to one front in addition to the ability to resolve the war in the interest of “Israel” in a short time and at the lowest cost. However, Western diplomatic bodies confirm that “Israel” is preparing for a large -scale air operation in Lebanon, with ground advances to impose the buffer zone along the border strip, and a depth of 7 km to the borders of the Litani, which is free from Hizbullah and its bases, residents, UNIFIL and even from the Lebanese army.
In the context of this, an Arab diplomatic source warned of the repercussions of the Israeli genocide of Gaza and the attempt to displace the people of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, warning that the repercussions will be great on Egypt and Jordan, and will leave great negative repercussions on the entire region.