Why does Israel insist on staying in the five hills in southern Lebanon?
In light of the escalating tension between Lebanon and Israel, and the intensification of international efforts, especially the American, to reach a settlement that includes Hezbollah disarming HezbollahReturning to the interface file The Israeli occupation of five strategic points in southern LebanonIt is known as the “Five Hills”, namely: Al Hamamis, Al Owaida, Jabal Balat, Al Labon, and Al Aziza.
An occupation despite Resolution 1701 and the ceasefire agreement
Despite the issuance of international resolution 1701 in 2006, which stipulated the suspension of hostilities between the two sides, and the withdrawal of Israel from Lebanese territory, but that The Israeli army is still stationed in the five hillsWhat constitutes a continuous violation of the UN resolution and hinders the fixation of the full Lebanese sovereignty south of the blue line.
Why to stick to this hills?
Explain the strategic expert Riad Kahwaji In an interview with MTV that The main reason for Israel’s adherence to these points It is its military and extremely important strategy. Advanced technology, on its importance, does not indile from one of the basic principles in land wars, namely: Control of the highlands.
Kahwaji adds:
“These five hills give the Israeli army an exceptional capacity on Monitoring villages and areas surrounding the south of LitaniIt also enables it to detect the moves accurately in the depth of Lebanese territory, which enhances its field superiority. ”
Starting points for any wild operation
It is not limited to the intelligence side, as these hills are also formed, according to Kahwaji:
“Launching platforms for any potential Berber incursion operation. If Israel decides to carry out a land attack inside Lebanon, these hills will be perfect starting points, facilitating the progress of forces in the three sectors of southern Lebanon.
A negotiating paper against Hezbollah’s weapon
It is noteworthy that Israel is not only treated as military sites, but also consider them Political pressure papers It is used in any regional or international negotiations, especially those related to the fate of Hezbollah.
According to Kahwaji:
“The Israeli adherence to these points is used in Negotiations on the disarmament of HezbollahIt is part of the pressure equation to expand the scope of disarmament to include all Lebanese lands, not only the south. ”
Lebanese link between withdrawal and disarmament
From the Lebanese side, the state insists that Any discussion on Hezbollah’s weapon must be linked to Israel’s full withdrawal from the occupied territoriesIncluding the five hills and other controversial points such as the Shebaa Farms and Kfarbashuba.
This link expresses a unified Lebanese position, who sees that The Israeli presence in the south justifies the survival of weapons in the hands of Hezbollah Under the title “Resistance”, while Israel seeks to remove this arms without providing any corresponding guarantees or withdrawals.
Geography and politics conflict
The battle of “the five hills” shows that the conflict between Lebanon and Israel is no longer just a traditional border conflict, but rather has become A struggle for highlands as military output tools and political pressure. While Israel seeks to use these sites to secure strategic superiority and the collection of negotiating gains, Lebanon insists on restoring them as part of national sovereignty, and links the future of weapons resisting to its full liberation.
And with continuing Washington’s negotiationsIt seems that the file of these hills will remain A basic knot in the way of any comprehensive settlement Between Lebanon and Israel.
The post Why does Israel insist on staying in the five hills in southern Lebanon? appeared first on 961 tobay Lebanon today.
