What are the repercussions of the Israeli attack on Doha Lebanese?

When the head of the government of Benjamin Netanyahu, with the knowledge of or without his knowledge, decided to strike a blow to the leaders of the “Ham” movement in Doha, he knew that the resurrection would be and will not sit. This knowledge is mainly drawn from the certainty of the extent of Qatar’s position on the regional map as a permanent time to calm and address matters wisely and rationalized, without recklessness and emotions in its place, and it is the role of the mediator to find the appropriate exits of the issue of the exchange of prisoners and the progress of the two countries in the work of the decisions of the Arab summit in Beirut.

This attack was a wide condemnation from all Arab countries as a whole and from the countries of the world, which considered that Israel has exceeded this attack on all red lines, and struck the wall all international covenants and norms, not parsed in what will be the form of reactions, which Tel Aviv considers merely “words with words.”
As for Lebanon, Qatar represents that sister country, which did not hesitate to stand by it in all its political and economic crises, especially the in -kind assistance it provided to the army, and it is still providing it. The word “thanks to Qatar” may be the best evidence of the presentations made by this sister country in the aftermath of the Israeli Adwan in the July War.
As for what does politics mean this attack on an absolute sovereign Arab country that has not been accustomed to anyone, but rather assaulted it from more than one side, especially during the siege imposed on it at a stage of “disagreement of brotherhood”, and what can be concluded from this attack at the Lebanese level, which may be concerned with this attack more than others, I will be taken into account in relation to what he can leave negative effects on the internal position of Lebanon And exposed to any setback or submission?
First, this attack comes in a detailed timing for Lebanon, which began to recover by little by little after the Cabinet’s approval of the army’s plan in relation to the exclusive weapon in the hands of the legitimate Lebanese forces, especially since the information received from the international emergency forces operations area south of the Litani River indicates that the army is continuing to implement its plan as it is drawn in full and complete.
However, this attack, which we can call more than an adjective that summarizes the word treachery, may delay the work of the army in the first stage of its military plan, based on the political position, which “Hizbullah” can resort to after its response on the ground in relation to the implementation of the plan had exceeded the proportions, which were pre -destined.
Second, Hizbulb may meet this attack, “a fat on a pie” in order to release any step that he could resort to in his response to the desire of the “older brother” not to obstruct the army plan. However, this attack came to give the “party” more arguments for not delivering its weapon, and he was the one who used to say that he did not secure the side of Israel based on treachery and violating the sanctities, covenants and international laws.
Third, this attack for the Lebanese government, which has taken place the success of the implementation of the army’s plan and commitment to the principles of the American paper with the approval of both Israel and Syria, may be an early warning bell that Tel Aviv will not go with any paper or any plan except among its conditions, which are usually incapable and illogical.
Fourth, compared to this attack in terms of its political size, it can be established on a fixed base, which is that Israel considers that there is no place in any geographical spot on the map of the region outside its air and intelligence capabilities, and it is highly insolent in order to dare to challenge the international will. This is another evidence that Tel Aviv will not stop its continuous attacks on Lebanon, and it is determined to keep its occupation of the five or nine hills based on what is not guaranteed that the authority in Lebanon is able to abide by what was stated in the army plan, and therefore what does not guarantee that its north is no longer threatened by “Hezbollah” or any other armed faction.
With this appetite, a page is folded to open another.