What are the repercussions of the American decision to cancel the mandate of the war on Iraq?

Al -Jazeera wrote: In an important step, the US House of Representatives voted to cancel the authorization of the use of military force, which was approved in wars on Iraq in 1991 and 2002.
This decision comes in light of major geopolitical transformations in the Middle East, and indicates the end of the era of direct military intervention in Iraq. However, some believe that the practical impact of the decision may be limited at the present time, especially with the continuing discussions about the restoration of American forces in the country. While the Iraqi political circles welcomed the decision, and considered it a “positive step towards strengthening national sovereignty.” The government adviser, Al -Hilali, believes that the United States’s decision to cancel the Gulf War executive of 1991 and 2002 represents a fundamental turning point in the relationship between the two countries, as it ends the era of the one. Optimization and begins a new era of strategic partnership. Until the United States is seeking to get rid of the burdens of external wars in light of the internal economic challenges, and to direct its efforts towards competition with China. In the context, Iraq emerges as a potential and promising partner, capable of stimulating the American economy through extensive investment opportunities. He added that the decision reflects the success of the Iraqi government in improving Iraq’s image on the international scene through effective diplomacy, indicating that the issue of the liberation of Russian researcher Elizabeth Tsorkov had a role in accelerating this decision, as it represents a reward from America to Iraq for this step, and a desire to win it as a friend and an ally And partner. Iraq announced last Wednesday the liberation of Tzorkov, which was kidnapped in late March 2023, and was later delivered to the United States Embassy. Hilali believes that Iraq’s gains from this decision will be in 3 main directions: strengthening Iraq’s relations with the Arab countries and the regional environment.
Supporting his position in concluding agreements and partnerships with international coalition countries and NATO.
Achieving a direct benefit from the political, security and economic partnership with the United States. Al -Hilali believes that this step will turn American foreign policy towards Iraq from a “occupied state” into a “ally and a partner state”, which serves the common interests of the two countries. For his part, the head of the Security and Defense Committee in the Iraqi parliament, Representative Karim Al -Mahmoudawi, said that the decision represents a positive step towards ending external interference in the Iraqi affairs. Al -Muhammadawi added to Al -Jazeera Net that “the decision is late, but it is an explicit recognition that the stage of direct military intervention has gone, and that Iraq today is a sovereign state, which manages its affairs with an independent national decision.” The increasing patriotism by ending the foreign presence, and enhances efforts to organize the relationship with the international community on the basis of mutual respect and common interests. Al -Muhammadawi stressed that Iraq will not be after today an arena for conflicts, and that such decisions must be invested to enhance the independence of the Iraqi decision. As for the researcher in political affairs Muhannad Al -Rawi, he pointed to a number of positive and negative observations about the consequences of the decision to cancel the authorization provided to the American forces In Iraq, the narrator told Al -Jazeera Net that the decision, despite its importance, carries with it serious dangers, especially with regard to the country’s air security, explaining that the cancellation of the mandate greatly restricts the ability of the American forces to address any possible external air force, given that it is the party that is currently securing Iraqi airspace. He added that this situation may enhance the nature of the bilateral relationship between Iraq and America in the term The near, medium and far, pointing out that “the sky of Iraq and its money is in the hands of America”, and that Iraq cannot dispense with the American role in these two sensitive files. The narrator expected that this decision would be reflected in the political equation in the country, where the Iraqi government and the political class will find itself to demand that the American forces remain to face these challenges. At a while, the legal expert Ali Al -Tamimi stressed that the decision to cancel the mandate granted to the presidents Americans to take military measures against Iraq put the relationship between the two countries “on a new basis of sovereignty and mutual respect”, which is an extension of previous attempts regarding the same topic. In 2021, the US House of Representatives voted to cancel the 2002 mandate, with the payment of a member of the then House of Representatives Tim Kane, but the draft law stopped in the Senate. In 2023, the Senate voted to cancel the mandate of 1991 And 2002 within one project, but it was not put up to vote in the House of Representatives, which was controlled by Republicans at that time. Al -Tamimi told Al -Jazeera Net that the decision means that “any American president who is coming to use military force against Iraq has the right without referring to the US Congress, with both representatives and the elderly, together. The decision also enhances – in his opinion – the position of Iraq as a sovereign state in its relationship with the United States, especially in the light of the agreement, especially in the light of the agreement The 2008 strategic framework, which regulates cooperation between the two sides in various fields. He also emphasized that the decision has important moral dimensions, as it “was dispelled fears that prevailed over the possibility of the return of American military intervention in Iraq, and transformed the relationship into a cooperation partnership according to the agreement.”