This is the story of Gibran Bassil with the weapon of Hezbollah

If the “Free Patriotic Movement” did not secure over the years the Christian cover of the “Hizbullah” weapon, it would have been easy for the state today to reach a solution that satisfies everyone. This cover, which was secured by the “current” of the “party” when President Michel Aoun was his president, continued with Representative Gibran Bassil, but with greater momentum, while this cover moved with the arrival of the “strong president” to the presidency of the Republic from his pure Christian dye to the legitimate character when the President of the Republic did not leave an occasion, whether at the United Nations or in Egypt except and benefited from it to give the legitimate character to the weapon “People, the Army, and the Resistance” in the basics of political action by including ministerial data this equation or similar. This cover has given the values ​​of the “bargaining” to consider its weapon as a legitimate recognition by the Lebanese state. This is what makes this file more complicated than some people even think that some people have called for the application of custom at the expense of the constitution.

However, the recent positions of the President of the “current”, Representative Gibran Bassil, calling for the disarmament of “Hezbollah” and restricting him to the Lebanese state came late. This is what made these positions without political success, although some of those who are still betting on the return of the “current” to its rules are safely indicating that Basil’s move, and if they come late, are better than never come.
Engineer Basil, who was among the engineers of the “St. Makhael” agreement, did not benefit much from the “current” alliance with “Hizbullah” except for what secured his current presence in a certain time in a certain timing “inhibitory”, while the “party” was able to invest politically through this agreement doubled, especially in the articulated stages, which made it face all who were facing all those who were objecting Before the government decided to assign the army, it has set a plan to receive this weapon.
Basil chose an inappropriate timing, in the eyes of many, to announce his almost complete coup against the line he walked for twenty years. And this time was a mistake in coinciding with the visit of the Secretary -General of the Supreme Council of Iranian National Security, Ali Larijani, to Beirut, who gave the “party” “Ofer Dose” from moral support, which made him cling to his weapon more than ever.
Basil has overturned his position in this “Mar Mikhael” agreement, but more than that when he considered any weapon outside the state illegal, and that the position of the healing “Hezbollah” weapon had fallen after its unilateral participation in the recent war, and that the survival of weapons outside the authority of the state has become a source of threat and danger to Lebanon.
The bottom line is that Basil retracted his agreement with “Hizbullah” will not add anything new to the scene except that it is a broken pragmatic, and he jumped late from the ship and going to certain options for electoral reasons that will not change from the date of the first political confusion caused by transcendent ideas on reality.
Before Basil made the decision to cut a “Muawiyah poetry” between him and “Hizbulb”, he devoted long and broad internal discussions, in order to be on the positives of this decision and its negatives at the same time.
As a result of all this discussion process, it was convinced that the continuation of his relationship with “Haret Hreik” will harm him more Christian and electoral than it can benefit. It is thus that it is like someone who is betting on his political future with the remaining “of” Swalch “, especially since there are rumors that he will not be nominated in Batroun this time, due to the high shares of the glory of Peter Harb in his face.
But there are data that must push Basil to reconsider what can be new from now until next May, the initial date for the electoral entitlement, especially since the dismantling of his alliance with the “party” will lose at least six parliamentary seats, especially if the “Amal” movement is committed to the position, which it can take “H. Beirut.
And hesitates in the corridors of “Haret Hreik”, despite its preoccupation with an exclusive file, that the “party” may find itself obliged to weave its electoral alliances with candidates who are on a rivalry with Basil, whether in Baabda, Jabil, Zahle and the western Bekaa, among them the two deputies are now Aoun in Baabda and Simon Abi Ramia in Jbeil, for example, but not limited to.
Thus, Basil has recorded a new failure on himself and his current, and if he tried to get to know what his swinging positions caused between imitating the gait of the part of the parting or maintaining the gait of the crow.