The Shiite duo wants a loose time frame awaiting the promised dialogue

Johnny Moner wrote in “Al -Gomhoria”: During the past days, Hizbullah raised his voice to warn of the consequences of managing the next session of the Council of Ministers in the way of my fifth and seventh session of last August. That is, bypassing the opinion of the “Shiite duo” ministers by going to adopt the vote, not understanding, it will result in different results from what matters have in the two sessions.

Several scenarios were leaked in the allied media circles of the duo, ranging from waving the permanent exit from the government, moving the land, as well as a return to the southern Litani region, to warning the return of the civil war if the army plan is applied by force. These warnings were attached to a campaign to target the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. But the remarkable was the tacit wink from the channel of the Speaker of Parliament, Nabih Berri, despite the adoption of his speech on the anniversary of the absence of Imam Musa al -Sadr.
According to the foregoing, quick conclusions can be made, according to the following:
First, despite the severity of political and media communication, the context of matters shows that the public ceiling does not allow the slide from the level of waving by force to the level of use of power and the implementation of threats.
Second, there is no doubt that the circumstances, facts and data are imposed on President Berri and the leadership of “Hezbollah” to coordinate to the maximum extent possible, even if there is a difference in views on the behavior that must be followed to ensure the interests of the Shiite sect.
Third, there are those who conclude that the Shiite team wants a timetable that is not defined on dates, or at least made the timeline loose, in the hope that the promised dialogue will become close with the approaching the expected parliamentary entitlement. And it caused it from Israeli reactions and attacks on the party and Lebanon, the fall of all fake weapons functions, a complete inability to confront the Israeli attacks on party centers and warehouses and the assassination of its cadres in more than one region.
Through its continuous threats against Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, the party is trying to repeat the methods of intimidation, threats and assassination, which it has pursued for the past two decades against former heads of government and political parties, who were demanding the party’s weapon under the authority of legitimacy.
Hezbollah resorted to the threat of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, directly and equivalent, and neutralizing its partners with power, the heads of the Republic and the parliament, to drop the state’s decision to withdraw weapons from the party, on the pretext that Israel did not respond to the American paper, a weak method, not justified or logical.
Hezbollah did not provide any acceptable reasonable reason for its demand to ask the government to return its decision to limit the weapon in its hands, after all the excuses of retention of the weapon to confront Israel last year and currently, and all the noise and intimidation against the government, its goal either to obtain security and demand guarantees, or specific political gains for the next stage, or repeat the attempt to re -dominate the party over the state with the strength of the remaining weapons, even if it is difficult The list is currently.