The Maronite rejection hinders the circulating offering

One of the complex issues raised on the internal scene, especially in light of the existing contrast regarding the role of Hezbollah and its relationship to the state. The principle upon which the constitution and most political forces are that the decision of peace and war must be exclusively in the hands of the state, as it is the only legal authority authorized to defend Lebanon’s sovereignty and protect its lands.

Based on this principle, in political salons, Hizbullah will cooperate with the state by declaring that the final reference for any military confrontation or a strategic decision is exclusively due to the constitutional institutions, in order to put the place under the roof of the state. On the other hand, the state’s role in formulating a defensive strategy or a comprehensive national strategy is highlighted, providing access to an understanding that ensures the integration of the capabilities of the place. Inclusion with state institutions, instead of being outside or alternative to it.
In this context, political circles believe that what is required is not to cancel the party’s role as much as it is framing within the state institutions, in a way that preserves the unity of the military and security decision, and provides a national cover comprehensive for any confrontation that may be imposed by the outside. However, those close to Hzel, Hezbollah asserts that the walk in this direction will collide with serious obstacles, most notably what is described as the Maronite rejection, which starts from political concerns.