The government session is under the roof of the world and international guardianship!

On the impact of the increasing external pressure and the ongoing Israeli attacks, Lebanon is preparing for a government session on Friday, which was devoted to discussing the army’s plan in relation to the exclusive file of weapons. However, this session does not appear to be the product of internal compatibility, but rather an international insistence on pushing the country towards a path directly related to the request to disarm “Hizbullah”, at a time when Israel refuses to withdraw from the Lebanese territories.

This path full of contradictions appeared clearly in the meeting that brought together the President of the Republic, Joseph Aoun, with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, as the meeting came out without any practical results, to confirm the depth of the air between the two men in the way of dealing with the file. On the one hand, Aoun deals with the issue with an accurate scale, warning of any hasty steps that may explode the interior if it is imposed without a political cover, while Salam goes on the opposite of this approach, adhering to an upgrade line until its end, as if the potential cost, no matter how much it is, does not constitute a reason for it to decline. It indicates that any government insistence on going with the arms plan will put the relationship with the “party” in front of an unprecedented test. The issue is not related to my formal presence, but rather is related to how Hezbollah’s “Hizbullah” interacts with the state if the latter decides to adopt the option of strength and enter into a direct confrontation. Thus, the discussion exceeds the limits of participation or boycott, to become an indication of the directions of the next stage: either the communication lines remain open in order to absorb the pressure, or to slide matters towards a break of the deepening of the internal rift and leave the field exposed to more dangerous possibilities. Israeli is absent until symbolic situations; There is no explanation of denunciation or movement with the United Nations, which makes this silence more than merely shortening, but rather an expression of political retreat equivalent to the seriousness of the external pressures itself, because it transforms the issue of sovereignty from a national issue into a pending file without actual defense. In exchange for this official retreat, the discourse of the opponents of Hizbullah is growing in a remarkable way. “The Lebanese forces”, which put internal stability in a secondary rank, raises the level of their challenge through the statements of their officials, so that it appears as if they were seeking to drag the country towards an open confrontation, even at the expense of civil peace, as it was not only limited to media debates or political positions, but rather reached the point of asking one of its deputies, the army to trap Dangerous confrontational. This is because the introduction of the military establishment in a direct confrontation with a wide segment of the Lebanese not only expresses a political gambling, but also reveals a project that intersects with the external desire to convert the army into an internal pressure tool rather than a protection force in the face of attacks. In this way, the opposition speech from the political difference site turns into the incitement site that threatens to detonate the interior at a moment when it continues the attacks without deterrence. This internal escalation coincided with Israeli raids that preceded the session a few days ago, in a scene that is not without direct messages. The enemy seemed to keep pace with the debate about the weapon with its own means, to remember that the real threat remains from the outside. However, the government does not show any willingness to make the defense of the country its first clause at its upcoming session, but rather prepares to be preoccupied with a plan inspired by the American paper, and thus the scene becomes inverted: Israel continues its aggression without deterrence, while the official effort is directed to rearrange the interior according to dictates that are not related to the protection of sovereignty. The beginning of August to the United Nations Charter to tighten Lebanon’s right to self -defense. And if the army leadership will participate in the government session, the fundamental question is whether the authority will translate that principle into a practical decision that allows the army to face the attacks, or that the slogan will remain ink on paper, while the country is led to the path of an external decree that ignores the truth of the continuous Israeli danger. The summary of the scene is that Lebanon enters a precise stage where international pressure intersects with the internal division, and the state is absent from its role in the face Al -Awwan. In light of this path, the question becomes beyond the discussion about a specific session, to affect the essence of the entity: How can a balance that protects sovereignty without turning the interior into an open square in front of the outside?