The duo escalates his position: the principle is rejected

Imad Merm wrote in “Al -Gomhoria”: The army knows that there are those who overwhelm him with poisonous emotions and poison him in the fat of praise and reverence in turn, trying to carry what exceeds his energy to bear, as if he is required to cover up the predicament of political power and find exits for it.

And if some of the political forces enthusiastic about the decision to withdraw weapons urge the military establishment to develop a clear and undesirable plan or dilute to disarm before the end of the current year, whatever the cost of the matter, then the “duo” Hzel. Hezbollah and the “Amal” movement still counts on the wisdom of the army and its skill to avoid dragging it into a swamp of an internal confrontation that does not condemn it, without appearing at the same time.
Whether the “duo” attended the cabinet session on Friday or boycotted it, and whether he shared it and then withdrew from it later or not, it is certain, whatever the scenario of the session, because it rejects the principle of research in the details of the army’s plan and its applied mechanism, and it will not be allowed to be lured into this square, because he is mainly objector to the origin of the decision to withdraw the weapon, and it is considered that it does not exist, and therefore it is not a matter that he has to go into a procedural discussion. Otherwise, it has not been blown out of his narrative.
After the visit of the American delegate, Tom Barak and his recent assistant Morgan Ortigos, to the Lebanese, he ended up with a negative outcome, the “duo” became more convinced of the necessity of avoiding the military establishment in a narrow angle, and the necessity of protecting it from a difficult test that is not already called, as long as the Israeli entity follows its intransigence and aggression, which is supposed to facilitate the state that is evaluated from the pressures that She is exposed to the army against the “party.”
There are those who point out that the political authority has become all the arguments and justifications for curbing its rhythm on the rhythm of the American paper that the Israeli entity refused to adhere to, and it is necessary that it must reduce pressure on the army, and refrain from turning the problem with Tel Aviv in the direction of the interior. Brigadier Malik Ayoub wrote in “Al -Bunah”: in Lebanese politics, nothing is complete until it turns on his head. Thomas Barrak, the American -Lebanese businessman who played the role of “mediator” between Beirut and Tel Aviv, washed his hands from the paper he presented to the Lebanese government weeks ago, after he touched himself that Benjamin Netanyahu does not see any peace settlement unless Lebanon abandoned the “Hezbollah” weapon, as a prerequisite for any Israeli withdrawal or stopping military operations.
That paper, which applauded it with the heat of the Lebanese cabinet, approved its items, and considered it a historic achievement, suddenly it seemed to be a bastard, in a Lebanese moment par excellence where the major decisions turn into just transient papers, which you do not find someone who adopts them. President Nabih Berri came on the anniversary of the absence of Imam Musa al -Sadr, to raise the “table of dialogue” to discuss the issue of weapons.
Next Friday, the government will meet to discuss the flame ball prepared by the army, but the atmosphere is tense: the duo ministers waved with withdrawal if the file is presented, and the Lebanese army itself refuses to be lured into an internal confrontation with Hizbullah, while Prime Minister Nawaf Salam seems to be moving forward in the implementation of the American -Saudi recipe with its fullness, even at the expense of the stability of the country.
Thus, today Lebanon appears to be stuck between the hammer of external pressures and the anchor of internal division. The Shiite community feels that it is besieged from the inside through an escalating sectarian discourse, and from the outside through an unprecedented political and diplomatic attack. The entire country is threatened with slipping into an internal sedition if the government decides to proceed with the application of the “ready -made recipe” that Washington and Riyadh formulated, and that he sees in Hezbollah except a clause that must be removed from the equation.