The dispute is renewed between Palestinian refugees and UNRWA

The exchange of accusations between the UNRWA and the forces representing the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon continues, after being hidden for some time.

Ibrahim Bayram wrote in “Al -Nahar”: The charge of reducing the agency for services and offerings that UNRWA used to provide to refugees, especially in the areas of health, education and aid, since its establishment as a specialized international organization after the 1948 calamity is the permanent charge on the part External, specifically American and Israeli, a policy that ultimately leads to the end of the agency and its liquidation, which has always considered an international witness to the refugee issue to ensure the right to return one day.
However, the agency always insists on denying this charge and is always keen to provide statements and evidence confirming that it is not inhabited by the initial health care of the refugees for free through 24 health centers spread in all Lebanese regions, and that health care services also include activities supported through 32 hospitals with which the agency contracts where the agency participates in the patient to pay the hospitalization bill.
The agency also indicates that it is preparing these days to open the doors of its affiliated schools to receive more than 32 thousand students by the first of next month. The agency in all of this challenges its difficult financial conditions and is making exceptional efforts to obtain the necessary funding to ensure the continuation of all its usual submission.
However, the relevant Palestinian authorities in charge of following up the file of the relationship with the agency have a different opinion, as it talks about registering new protests in most camps against the “agency’s decline in the agency” and reducing their services, and those bodies explained that the protests included the Nahr Al -Bared and Beddawi camp in the north, Burj Al -Shamali and Ain al -Hilweh in the south, and they expressed themselves with sit -ins and closing the agency’s headquarters, and the climax of the escalation of these protest movements in The closure of refugees is the doors of the agency’s headquarters in Beirut and prevented the employees from entering it.
The official in charge of the popular action file in the “Ham” movement in Lebanon accuses Raafat once, as it pursues an aggressive policy against the interests of refugees. “We in this context call for a Palestinian -Palestinian understanding and then a Palestinian -Lebanese understanding that assigns our desire to preserve the agency and its role, develop its performance and improve its services.”