President Berri on the anniversary of absentee

Those who know President Nabih Berri, as his official and partisan capacity, were not surprised by the words he announced on the 47th anniversary of the absence of Imam Musa al -Sadr. What the “Professor” said came as a result of a wide fan of communications, and a natural result of an in -depth reading because of the changes in the region that can only be approached from a comprehensive perspective and from different angles, and not to be satisfied with looking to the future from its narrow angles and immediate interests.
What President Berri wanted to say in this precise, sensitive, and dangerous circumstance, which Lebanon and the region are going through, is an attempt to put the Lebanese cart on its correct railway before it turns upside down, so he goes from board to poor fate. Correcting the direction of the government compass, in more than one political party, is a step that has become required today before tomorrow, and even before the cabinet session postponed from Tuesday to Friday for “the necessities of an inclusion”. The presidential and responsible speech of President Berri is the one that is dependent on the removal of everyone from their trees, which they all believed, that they are able to hide behind its weak papers, to discover at the end of the end that they were wrong. In appreciation and management, and that returning from error is a type of virtue lost in the narrow political visits, which will inevitably lead only to a dead end of the horizon. Can we put President Berri’s words in the “preaching” field with “the possible and available solution”, or in the “early warning” field about what the political scene can witness from the chaos that is not calculated by the results of what may happen in the near future if not everyone comes down to everyone The chaos, and they sit at one table to discuss all the contentious issues, starting with the topic of “exclusive weapon”, according to the government expression, or according to the expression that the leaders of “Hizbulza” prefer to use, which is the “defensive strategy”, as well as researching the items contained in the American paper, which the government agreed with all its provisions without the seizure, in the words of the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun. The inventory of weapons falls if Israel does not abide by stopping its hostile actions, which is a prerequisite contained in the American -Lebanese paper, and thus all that was decided in the 5 and 7 August sessions without value, if not “fell” on what was stated in the words of Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Mitri, who later denied that he had used this expression. Not to pressure Israel to stop its daily attacks against sites within the internationally recognized geography of Lebanon. This is what was shown from the “answer or no answer”, which Tom Barak returned from Tel Aviv, as if Israel was not giving any answer that wanted to suggest that it is sharing with “Hizban” in the use of the same expression, so it tells the Lebanese government about offering “the step in exchange for a step” “with his mouth and drink Mito”, but in the opposite direction, if each party behaves on the way that he can act His interests believe in him, while the legitimate state of the current government, is absent from hearing as if as “the arms in the wedding”. When President Berri says what he said, this means one thing of two things, which is that the torrent has reached the zipper, and that any other words is to pay Lebanon, from where the motives know or do not know, to the mouth of the lion, who is waiting for his prey on the authority of 31 As before. This is what those who revolve in the orbit of the so -called “enlarged powers” say. What was correct before this date was no longer acceptable after it. In any case, what President Berri announced “our openness to discuss the fate of this weapon, which is our honor as Lebanon in the framework of a calm dialogue, is consensual in a way that leads to the formulation of a strategy for national security” the right entrance may be in order to put all the political components of their concerns, concerns and future aspirations on the table of “frankness and reconciliation”, as without real frankness remains National reconciliation is a type of mutual lying, and the weapon of Hezbollah and any other illegal weapon remains outside the national consensual equations and outside the real reconciliations about the identity of Lebanon, which will remain Arab and open to the world. The reactions, as expected, between the conditional welcome and between the vulnerability and the vulnerable to the symptoms of what could be new developments between Sunday, August 31 and Friday, on September 5, in the hope that its party will be wet with what the wounds are bound and the ghost of interior sedition.