Lebanon has two options, the best of which is

Sam Mansi wrote in “Al -Sharq Al -Awsat”: What the Republican Senator Lindsay Graham and Ambassador Barak from the Presidential Palace made an unprecedented turmoil that dismissed the impression that was repeated about Washington’s interest in Lebanon to the extent that there is no American policy towards this country.

After the words of Graham and Barake, the Israeli answer to the Lebanese paper is no longer the same importance, as they paid a clear path on the Lebanese and Lebanese authority in general if they want to choose it, and its result is the withdrawal of Israel, protection, American guarantees, and reconstruction with a Gulf partnership. The American track goes beyond the Israeli demands in terms of a buffer zone without the population, and in the end, the minimum of Washington’s goal is a final and permanent endowment of military operations between Lebanon and Israel and the disarmament of the party that will lose its role after security arrangements such as Syria, and the maximum borders are normalized for relations. It is clear that the ultimate goal of the Americans is to expand the Abrahamic agreements to include in the future Lebanon and Syria when the surrounding circumstances mature.
After this visit and what was issued by it, Lebanon has two options, both of which are fraught with risks in relation to its internal conditions, which are very complex on the one hand, and Iran’s attempts to preserve the remaining influence of Lebanese policy through Hizbullah on the other hand.
The first option is to walk the American plan. Whatever the interests of Washington, the Lebanese should be seriously thinking about this path that serves and in line with American values ​​and interests with them, as it serves the troubled and unstable and bankrupt Lebanon for decades.
The second option is to evade tact and diplomacy in the Lebanese way of American shows, in a way that has become sterile, especially with this different administration from its predecessors. Escape means trying to coexist with incomprehensible Israeli mood and with the continuing security violations that may develop into large or small war operations, and perhaps into a widespread suicide war according to the goals of the Iranian sponsor.
The exits appear to be blocked. To the dilemma he lives today.