Is Hizbul: Hezbollah continued to contain?

In light of the accelerated developments in the region and the political and security pressures it carries, “Hizbullah” finds itself in front of a specific path that must be followed to ensure that the current stage is passed. This path is not based on retreating or waiving the constants, but rather on a basic principle that accompanies its literature for years, which is the ability to contain and bend to the storm without prejudice to the essence of its strategy or the military path that he considers a pillar of its existence and its regional role.
The party deals with this stage as a temporary circumstance that requires a greater amount of tactical flexibility in exchange for a strict adherence to the major constants. The first rule in the party’s behavior stems from not being drawn into options that may weaken it in the long run. The concessions, whether political, military or ideological, are not included in its accounts. On the other hand, he balances the adherence to the principles and the tactic “curvature of the storm” that allows it to cross with the least possible losses, especially in light of the dense external pressures and the regional changes that require it constantly re -reading the scene. Besides, the party puts a top priority to install its position within the Shiite community. He sees that any defect in the internal structure of the sect may be reflected directly on its ability to political and security confrontation. Therefore, he seeks to resolve the idea of ​​political unity within the sect, considering that the unification of the ranks and the control of internal discretions is the basic guarantee of its continued strength in the face of its local and regional opponents. Also, protecting the sect from the repercussions of the war or any widespread military escalation remains a central goal in its strategy. The party realizes that any new “catastrophe” will afflict the environment that embraces it will weaken its ability to withstand, and may threaten the depth of its popular presence. Therefore, it depends on a precise policy based on avoiding the unaccounted escalation, and working to reduce the foods that the sect may pay, without giving up its positions or appearing as the broken side. Hizbullah deals with the current developments through three basic pillars: tactical containment of the storm, strengthening the internal Shiite unity, and avoiding exposing the incubating environment to any major catastrophe. With this approach, he seeks to pass the current stage with flexibility calculated, without excessively what it considers the essence of its existence. The stage, in his view, may be difficult and pressing, but it is not enough to change a strategic path that has been limited to many years ago, but rather an additional test of the party’s ability to adapt to the balance of the changed forces.