How did you turn into a disruption tool?

Eli Elias wrote in “Calling of the homeland”: In order not to lose the current historical opportunity, a clear timetable must be set to accommodate weapons under the leadership of the army, with visual reconstruction projects implemented by the state’s command to dispel fears and establish the legitimacy of monopoly. “Services” must be separated from “weapons” by transferring care networks to the state and municipalities, and the adoption of a national communication policy within the Shiite environment that recognizes its fears and provides a security and service alternative to the leadership of the state, not a speech that increases polarization. In parallel, a realistic diplomacy requires a cease -fire and the framework of an updated truce with Israel is required, and the army and reconstruction support partnerships are secured by national institutions exclusively.

The bottom line is that the “Charter” in the “Hizbullah” dictionary is evoked when the state’s decisions threaten its weapon, and it is denied when its agenda is imposed on the state. This is not a charter; This is a balance of power over the constitution. If it is 5, 7 August and 5, the starting stations, then its decisive test is: Do we keep the “Charter” really an inclusive to protect the state, or do we leave it a slogan that is called for the demand to protect a weapon outside it? The real charter today is one: the sovereignty of the state, complete and incomplete