H. Hezbollah plans to drop the decision to restrict weapons and the government does not retreat

Ibrahim Haider wrote in “Al -Nahar”: From today until next Friday, Lebanon is witnessing days of tension in a race between the government’s receipt of the army’s plan, and the insistence of “Hizbullah” and the Shiite duo in general to drop the decision to restrict weapons. As it is difficult to determine what will be produced by the ongoing consultations to reach a way out of the government session, the stage of the cabinet session will bear many risks in an internal atmosphere charged.

Days before the session, a pessimistic black image began to be formed between the possibility of slipping towards a political and security internal confrontation, and Lebanon’s exposure to international pressure if the government retracted the exclusive decision of the weapon, accompanied by a continuous Israeli escalation. The data indicate that the army leadership is committed to submitting its plan to the cabinet, and it will not be subject to amendment, but it is a deliberate plan that does not lead to collision, but rather from Lebanese accounts exclusively to restore the sovereignty of the state.
Diplomatic sources indicate that a discussion occurred between several references about the decision, which resulted in that any decline under pressure means the fall of the ministerial statement and the department’s discourse, and thus the fall of the government, in addition to exposing Lebanon to significant international pressure. Therefore, the research is taking place on securing a Lebanese consensus on the inventory of weapons from a Lebanese national interest, while confirming the commitment to stop hostilities and implement the terms of the ceasefire agreement.
While “Hizbullah” raises its pressure on the government, information indicates that the pressures of the Shiite duo may use the street for tension and pressure may begin according to the scenario of the Shiite ministers withdrawal, then resort to the street and demonstrate and strikes that are launched with civil calls and through unions, and then expand towards the incubating environment.
There does not seem to be a return from the government’s decision for its president, Nawaf Salam, to spare Lebanon international pressure, especially in light of the high level of tension in the region, the blockage of negotiation between Iran and America, and the escalation of Israeli aggression in the region. If Lebanon does not advance its files, the conditions of the region may be reflected in it, with the siege, war, chaos, and dismantling.