Fears of the Iranian agenda and expectations that Washington is obligated to a cease -fire

“Al -Nahar” wrote: The Lebanese scene has changed within days, from the maximum state of bound, to the relatively internal satisfaction space, despite the caution that remained prevailing in the internal scene, as long as the executive steps are frozen, based on the issue of the cease -fire, which Israel has not committed. But the international capitals concerned with the Lebanese situation, specifically Washington and Paris, followed the Lebanese path in all its details, on the impact of the pressures that Tel Aviv is taking, to disarm “Hizbullah”. And they concluded that the result of it was that Lebanon took an exclusive road, which requires Israel to start practical steps as well.

The decisions of the Lebanese Council of Ministers were not transient stations in the accounts of international capitals, but rather found a practical starting point to end the war between Lebanon and Israel.
Sources informed to Al -Nahar said that “the countries have received positively the Lebanese path in the approach of the“ Hezbollah ”weapon file, and praised the wisdom of the President of the Republic, Joseph Aoun, who succeeded in conducting an accurate balance, between the Lebanese obligations in front of the international community, and between maintaining internal stability in Lebanon. After international capitals were afraid of one of two things: the Lebanese government is from its obligations regarding the exclusive weapon, its inability to go towards imposing its decisions, and from chaos in Lebanon, due to the clash with the party.
The same sources believe that coordination between President Aoun and the Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri led to the production of an acceptable and internationally acceptable formula, the President of the Republic worked to accomplish it, and to preserve the position and decisions of the Lebanese state in it, and it is based on the following:
First, the implicit recognition of the Shiite duo, the decisions of the Council of Ministers, after objecting to the content of the fifth and seventh sessions of last August, and leaving the cabinet session, during the presentation of the Lebanese Army report.
Secondly, the final ceasefire decision is established by Lebanon.
Third, developed an executive military plan for the army and its approval government.
Fourth, full commitment to international agreements, and what was stated in the department’s speech, the ministerial statement and the Taif Agreement.
Fifth, moving towards setting a comprehensive strategy for national security.
Sixth, not to drown at the timing of time paths, because implementation will be subject to the capabilities of the army, and to know the size and geography of the weapon stores, which require cooperation from the party itself. Therefore, it was relied on productive stages.
International capitals understood the steps that Lebanon made, which have become subject to the consensus of the political authorities in it, after the President of the Republic arranged with the heads of the House of Representatives and the cabinet of exits, which guaranteed the achievement of arms exclusive in the hands of the Lebanese state, but the capitals became convinced that implementation also needs an Israeli decision to stop the fire.
The informed sources say that “the Americans are now convinced of the importance of Tel Aviv on executive steps, after the US officials viewed during their recent visit to Lebanon, from the President of the Republic and the leadership of the army, on the volume of commitment and seriousness in Lebanon, so Washington will pressure the Israelis to stop the fire, and start the gradual withdrawal from Lebanese territory, in parallel with the executive steps in Lebanon towards the exclusive arms in the hands of the state Lebanese.
But the sources are still afraid of the Iranian agenda, which wants to ignite a new field crisis with Israel, leading to a settlement that gives Tehran momentum after the recent setbacks that were exposed to it in the region. This called on the Americans, the French and others to withdraw the excuses from the front of Hizbullah, and separate the Lebanese path from its regional surroundings.