Any future for Lebanon?

Joseph Qasifi wrote in “Al -Gomhoria”: Lebanon is the country of killing identities that soon turns into fatal identities due to international and regional changes that relax it with its weight. Its problem exceeds the shares and influence to what is deeper. That is, to the courage to recognize that the will to live together without dropping caution, does not constantly build stability, but rather deepens the culture of the infidel of this or that party. Does that mean silence? It is not assumed to face reality with the behavior of the ostrich, but with the courage of the official, and here comes the role of the elite to assume its responsibilities in answering more than one question:

First: Is the “Taif Agreement” still able to address the problem of Lebanon in all its dimensions, if it is completed the implementation of its entire provisions?
Second: So it shows the “Taif Agreement” inability to surround the problem and put pillars for a sustainable solution, is there an ability to search for an alternative formula that is tantamount to the re -establishment of the homeland that the holders of the Greater Lebanon Brigade wanted a habitat of freedom, and they embrace the positive interaction between its religious sects within the framework of the dialogue of civilizations that constitute the opposite of the theory of Samuel Huntington with the inevitability of its clash Lymps ruling the universe?!
Third: Is it possible for the Lebanese to justify national immunity that protects their homeland, and how is this without the will of life together, and they are still present and can be built on?
Whatever considerations, the last war on Lebanon has opened the door to great challenges and serious questions, the answer will not be possible in the foreseeable future.