An Israeli researcher talks about the fate of the party’s weapon .. What did he say?

The Israeli newspaper “Maariv” published a new report in which it spoke about the issue of removing “Hezbollah’s” weapon in Lebanon, noting that the situation at the northern border between Lebanon and Israel is “more complicated.”

In the report translated by “Lebanon 24”, Colonel (Ihdad) spoke Israeli analyst Jacques Neria about the speech of the Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri yesterday on the anniversary of the absence of Imam Musa al -Sadr and its repercussions on Lebanon and Israel, calling on Israel not to adhere to the American demands related to the disarmament of “Hezbollah”. Hezbollah’s position, which first calls for the withdrawal of Israel from Lebanon, the start of the reconstruction of the south, and the stopping of all Israeli military activities throughout Lebanon before agreeing to discuss the disarmament of the party. He said that “Hezbollah is preparing to oppose the Lebanese government if it decides to continue efforts to remove his weapon, in the event that Iran decides to confront Israel.” He continued: “Meanwhile, the first rifts began to appear in the Lebanese relationship with the American actors, so Barak was unable to visit the Khayyam and Tire regions in southern Lebanon because of the anti -America protests.” He continued: “With this, he did not remain in front of Joseph Aoun and President Its visit is only limited options, either to continue the attempt to disarm and risk the renewal of the civil war, or the use of the Israeli declaration that Israel does not intend to withdraw before the disarmament of Hezbollah, as an excuse to stop the process of implementing the Lebanese government’s decision issued at the beginning of August, and related to the Lebanese army demanding a plan to disarm the party by the end of 2025.. Better than direct confrontation with Hezbollah.