A joint defense treaty with Lebanon was discussed in Congress

Now he wrote Sarkis in “Calling of the National”: The visit of the American Congress delegation and the statement of the American Senator Lindsay Graham from Beirut on a joint defense treaty with Lebanon was remarkable. Everyone thought that this matter was an idea and was launched and ended here, but what happened was that Graham went through his idea.
The new thing is that Graham put this idea two days ago to the US Congress, and it is known that Congress is an important decisions factory. Graham stressed the proceeding of this idea to its application, explaining the importance of concluding such a treaty for Lebanon and America as well. This proposal indicates the importance of preserving Lebanon’s stability, when signing this agreement there is an umbrella of American protection over Lebanon, so the militias do not reconcile its borders and make a war every thirty years. This treaty will help the Lebanese army reinforcing itself, strengthening its military capabilities, strengthening it, and allowing it to extend its authority. As, as a result of this treaty, Lebanon will be able to protect its oil and gas wealth and extract it without any problems. What is remarkable during the interventions in the Congress is to remember one of the Senatorians in the incident of 1958 when President Camille Chamoun asked the Marines to intervene after the revolution and it came down to the beaches of Beirut, the American forces, that day Lebanon was linked to a treaty with Washington and could intervene to protect him. The treaty quickly. It protects the land of Lebanon, secures the umbrella of protection and preserving its sovereignty and borders, and solving all the outstanding problems with Israel, and it is granted guarantees not to attack Lebanon as a result of the presence of the American forces in Beirut and the expansion of the bases in support of the Lebanese army and to preserve security and stability. Ortagos discussions come in Lebanon and insist on implementing the American paper to secure a protection collar for Lebanon and prepare later for an American-Lebanese security agreement that would be The fruit of a long cooperation that establishes a stage of stability. Lebanon, who is suffering from an economic crisis, and introduced it to the “Party of God” in the Great War game that it lost, imposing its conditions, there is an American desire to restore Lebanese sovereignty for a final time, but if Lebanon is not pleased with the path of the decree and the “party” keeps Lebanon to the interests of Iran, this means the return of the war, then no one can bear its consequences. Congress, and it seems that there is a desire to accelerate this matter. Time factor is not in the interest of Lebanon and any of the political power means paying the country the most expensive price.