Former government heads statement: Vivication of powers without confrontation with Aoun

Sabine Owais wrote in “Al -Nahar”: From the condemnation of the Israeli attacks on the south, to the Israeli persistence in the war of extermination in Gaza and the plan of Donald Trump to end the war, former government heads Fouad Siniora and the complete peace and Najib Mikati entered the Lebanese scene in terms of praise, support and adherence to the government’s decision to restrict weapons, up to the poem where the former presidents sensed the danger to which the government head By asserting that «the ultimate and most important goal in these circumstances is to preserve the unity of the country and the rule in addressing the affairs of the state, especially in implementing the procedures that achieve adherence to respect for the constitution, the Taif Agreement and the rule of law. It is stigmatized to crystallize this through the cooperation and solidarity of the constitutional authorities in a way that achieves these goals, and in a way that establishes confidence in the unity of the country and the governance of the management of state affairs.

After a long absence from the meetings that sometimes took the periodic nature, the last of which was in early January with the Saudi delegate Prince Yazid bin Farhan, with the participation of Bahia Hariri, representative of President Saad Hariri, the former government presidents club appeared the day before yesterday to address the recent political and security developments, entering the essence of the subject of the meeting related to the campaigns that Prime Minister Nawaf Salam is exposed to more than one front. He directed targeting campaigns that he is exposed to on two fronts, the first As the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, he presides over all security meetings in the absence of the Prime Minister.
Former presidents support Salam in the way that the man is not left, in an attempt to fortify the powers of the government, but without this aim to open a confrontation with the President of the Republic or to give any sectarian trend to their movement, as they say their circles, because the goal is not to increase damage but rather to reduce it. One of the signatories asserts that the presidents did not mention peace by name in order not to give sectarian support but rather support to the state and an affirmation of the importance of the unity of government, in other words that the President of the Republic and the government are compatible with the situation, and most importantly, the coordination is existing between them. From here, the statement carried an invitation to the President of the Republic to not rush, because the result was inverse to everyone, the most important in the image of internal solidarity abroad, and the ability to implement major decisions such as exclusive weapons, after he abandoned the prevention of lighting.