The decision to limit the weapon is valid: Why did the duo anger and why did he calm down?

Lara Yazbek – Central

The duo of Amal – Hezbollah after August 5 and August. The party’s Secretary -General, Sheikh Naim Qassem, threatened the civil war, Al -Wail, Al -Thabour, and the great things. The party considered the government and its president Nawaf Salam and its members, as well as the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun, subject to the American -Israeli project and its surrender. The Shi’a ministers withdrew from the cabinet sessions and did the same thing in the September 5 session, and the “duo” Aoun and Salam boycotted.

But after the aforementioned session, the duo’s position changed, his anger calmed down, and the communications between Ain Al -Tineh on the one hand, Baabda and Al -Saray on the other hand, were changed at a time when its resumption is also narrated between Baabda and Al -Saray on the one hand and the southern suburb on the other hand. The Secretary -General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qasim, considered on Wednesday that “the government in the 5 and 7 August sessions took decisions that were almost taking the country to a major sedition before its disruption.”

But what has changed? Why did the duo go back and why did he calm down? There are no clear answers, according to what sovereign sources say to “Centrality”. The decision to limit arms in the hands of the state issued on 5 and 7 is what ignited the duo “uprising”, not the Lebanese army’s plan to implement it. This decision is still the same and valid. As for the issue of not including the army, its plan is a timeless, just a detail that is not presented or delayed. The important thing is that it was put to “implement” the decision to collect illegal weapons.

In any case, and from the pulpit of Ain al -Tina, Salam confirmed that the decisions to restrict weapons are fixed and that the “welcoming” of the army plan means implementing them. It was clear that this issue is found in the constitution and in the ministerial statement. He said: The Cabinet’s decision is very clear, whether it is in the August 5 session or in the September 5 session, and we are starting from the Taif Agreement, which we have delayed decades of its application that says that the authority of the Lebanese state over its entire lands with its own forces, the ministerial statement stipulates the exclusive weapon, stipulates the restoration of the war and peace decision, and confirms and confirms what the Taif Agreement has brought about to extend the authority of the Lebanese state over its entire land with its own forces It was stated in His Excellency the President of the Empire for the Exclusive Weapon, and this ministerial statement that we took the confidence of the House of Representatives, we are committed to it, and “Hezbollah” once and two gave the government confidence on the basis of this ministerial statement, and this is what we are working to implement …

Even Salam refused to talk about the issue of “dialogue” on weapons or defense strategy, which is proposed by Berri, asserting that the decision is taken in constitutional institutions and that there is no mention in any place for the defense strategy but rather a national security strategy.

In front of this firmness, the sources do not rule out that the party’s reduction in its roof is due to its feeling that the street game will not succeed this time in the fear of anyone but rather to it, and that any repetition of the May 7 scenario will show it in the form of the aggressor because anyone will not face it “militarily”. Consequently, he is an understanding that he is “crushed” and that “the first time is a transformation” and that he must, and this situation, from the at least temporary, is to review his options, even if party officials, headed by Qasim, are still “verbal”, they speak in a high tone. The sources also say that Iran may have asked the party to wait because it in turn is to re -read its policies and decisions in the region in the light of the accelerating developments, from Gaza to Syria to reach QatarAnd in light of the talks between them and Troika, the sources conclude.

The post The decision to limit the weapon is valid: Why did the duo anger and why did he calm down? appeared first on 961 tobay Lebanon today.