Israel breaks the borders and strikes in the depth of the Gulf

In an unprecedented development that reflects a dangerous slide of the conflict into new arenas, Israeli fighters launched focused raids on a leadership house in the Hama movement in the Qatari capital, Doha, where a meeting of the first -class leaders of the movement was held to discuss a proposal presented by US President Donald Trump to stop the war in Gaza. Despite the conflict of reports in the early hours, Hama officially announced the survival of its leaders and the negotiating delegation from the attack, but it called five of its elements, including Hammam al -Hayya, the son of the prominent political bureau member Khalil al -Hayya, in addition to his office manager Jihad Labad. The Qatari Ministry of Interior also mourned a security element and announced the injury of others. While Israeli media revealed that the assassination plan was ready for about a year, awaiting an intelligence opportunity that brought together the movement’s leadership for the first time in one place.

The most attention is the American position. At a time when the White House confirmed that Israel had previously informed the Ministry of Defense of the intention of targeting the leaders of Hama in Qatar, he explained that President Trump did not agree to the position of the operation, but rather after its occurrence to contact the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, stressing that such an order will not be repeated on Qatari lands. White House spokeswoman Caroline Levitt quoted Trump as saying that hitting Ham.S is a legitimate goal, but at the same time he was keen to reassure Doha about her sovereignty. This contrast opens the door to many questions, so did Tel Aviv have already surprised the White House, or was the matter that implicitly satisfied Washington later to disintegrate and avoid embarrassment in front of a strategic ally like Qatar, which embraces the largest air base An American in the region? Arab political sources confirm that the process carries further indications of mere targeting of Hama leaders, as it first indicates the liquidation of the negotiation option, Ventao has sent a message that he does not see in Ham or in any armed faction as a party that can be negotiated. The equation he proposes is: surrender without charge. Secondly, the intermediaries are overwhelmed, as the blow in Doha is a direct indication that Israel is no longer causing brokers, but rather underestimating their endeavors. This is a dangerous development that undermines the rules of regional mediation, which traditionally formed a safety valve to avoid the comprehensive explosion. Third, the sovereignty of states is to carry out the operation on the land of an Arab country that is related to open relations with Israel and the West, meaning that Netanyahu is ready to overcome international borders and laws whenever he sees this serving his security and political goals. It is an approach he previously repeated in the assassination of the leader Ismail Haniyeh on Iranian soil. Fourth, the revenge dimension, the blow came after a qualitative operation in Jerusalem, which is likely that Netanyahu wanted to record a quick response that restores his cracked image internally. And fifth, a regional deterrent message, as Tel Aviv does not exclude the expansion of the theater of operations to affect other countries such as Jordan and Egypt, especially if forced displacement plans from Gaza stumbled. But this adventure is fraught with risks, as Egypt has repeatedly declared that any penetration of its borders will be met with a direct response. The raid on Doha can also be read, according to the sources in a deeper framework related to the crisis of the Israeli leadership. Despite the massive destruction in Gaza, Netanyahu did not achieve the goals of the stated war, and he did not succeed in liberating the prisoners by force. His image at home shakes with the exacerbation of the community division and the decline in confidence in its ability to decide. Abroad, his isolation increases with the escalation of criticism of the genocide and the decline in Israel’s balance in world public opinion. At the moment of political bankruptcy, the option of escalation and going to the maximum violence becomes a single haven.
What happened in Qatar is not a targeting of a country from the axis of Al -Maqqa. Therefore, the raid is a strategic shift that opens the door to a new stage of conflict, titled the collapse of the rules of engagement and the decline in the immunity of national sovereignty in front of Israeli military accounts.