Lebanon’s priority between Aoun’s speech and the army plan

Marilyn Wahba wrote in “Al -Gomhoria”: The meetings and communications remained in place throughout the days and hours that preceded the session of the military report, between the Presidents of the Republic and the House of Representatives, through the assistant of President Nabih Berri, MP Ali Hassan Khalil, and the advisor of President Joseph Aoun, retired Brigadier General Andre Rahal, and keeping pace with the Director General of Public Security, Major General Hassanish, regarding the communication between Baabda and “Hizbullah” specifically. According to the information, the President of the Republic had never spoken of imposing implementation, without obliging Israel. Aoun has already repeatedly repeatedly repeated the American delegations: “We apply our duties, we are waiting for Israel to abide by the terms of the agreement, and we will not be able to complete what is required of us, for a fundamental reason, related to the inability of the Lebanese army to continue to spread in the south, without the withdrawal of the Israelis, and the lack of easy translation of an exclusive decision, without stopping fire by Israel.” The President of the Republic was reminding that he was committed to the discourse of the division, especially since the spirit of the discourse focused on the “national security strategy”. From here, the essential meeting point between Aoun and Berri was to reach an exclusive goal of weapons, as the strategic proposals of the two men converge in the interest and stability of the country.

All international delegates, who are concerned with the stability of Lebanon, in Arab and Western countries, realized that the party’s possibility, without a Lebanese consensus, has been aware, as the South Litani station was repeated in front of them: the army is still working for nearly 8 months, on an exclusive task of weapons, without being able to complete the mission. No one knows practically as Lebanon needs time, to end the file of weapons. How if Israel continues to target and occupy it? Basically, Israel cannot end the file of the “Hezbollah” weapon, due to considerations that the Americans realize: First, it takes land invasions, neither intention nor Israeli ability to achieve this. Second, Gaza and the West Bank are priorities in the agenda of Israel, and they need additional years, while other headlines come in the latest interests.
Third, there is no interest in anyone in the region, by increasing the chaos that does not serve Israel either, as Washington’s desire to maintain the stability of Lebanon appears.
All of this is the final of the Lebanese solution to the weapon file, and through what was reported by the discourse of the division, and what the army’s plan has inspired, based on a settlement produced by the national security strategy.