Does “Marines” reach the shores of Lebanon?

Alan Sarkis – Call of the homeland

The United States of America entered the war directly. President Donald was implemented Trump What he threatened. With Washington directing strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, the region’s face began to change. Lebanon watches what will be in the region and its new position to build on the required thing.

Lebanon is automatically affected by what is happening in the region. The greatest influence was in 1979 when the Islamic revolution in Iran succeeded and was issued to Beirut, and the country lived all the confrontations, tensions and wars it experienced.

The Lebanese state stands at this historical moment, the position of the spectator and unable to influence the course of events. If it was firmly interfered after the end of the last war and the signing of the armistice agreement on November 27, it would have reached its authority on all lands and the weapon of all the Lebanese and non -Lebanese militias and controlled the decision.

The American warning message arrived a few days ago to Lebanese officials through the American delegate Tom Barak. It seems that the rulers did not understand them well. This was evident through the cabinet refusing to take the proposal of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriate Youssef Raji, who called on the government to take a position on the statement of the Secretary -General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qassem, who confirmed Iran’s support and not to stand up to neutrality.

American and Western warnings continue to Lebanon. After Trump enters the war immediately in Iran, the Lebanese government must return its accounts. Informed sources confirm that what happened in Iran is a message not only to the Persian state, but also to all its arms in the region, and to the countries and governments that do not move a finger towards these arms.

The sources point out that all governments are aware of what is happening, and any defect in behavior will open the gates of hell to these arms and states, and therefore Lebanon must pack its matter and stop the policy of pace and the conflict.

Washington is trying to observe the Lebanese situation as much as possible, but without giving up the basic principles, the most important of which is the end of the military arm of Hezbollah, the authority of the state’s authority over all its territory and the collection of all illegal weapons. What the “reluctance” axis in Lebanon is trying to suggest in the media is the opposite of the truth that is said in the closed rooms.

The area entered articulated days. If Hezbollah decides to support Iran and open the South Front, it will bring the devastating Israeli response, and this matter does not want the Lebanese state, not even a segment of the Shiite environment. This rejection appeared in the statement of the Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, who confirmed that Lebanon did not enter the war, while the “party” responded quickly through the tongue of Qasim.

It is not possible to speculate on what may happen, especially if Iran’s arms decide to move in Yemen, Iraq, Gaza and Lebanon. As for the Lebanese situation, and whether Washington will move to help Tel Aviv if Hezbollah enters the war, the informed sources assert that Trump struck Iranian nuclear facilities because Tel Aviv does not have the bombs capable of destroying them, and as long as Israel is able to do so, there will be no American interference in wars with arms. As for Hezbollah, it has lost most of its capabilities and has not posed a danger, and the battle with it is easy after the fall of the Assad regime and the strike of Iran.

Washington is currently the most influential country in Lebanon. Lebanon depends mainly on American support. Washington has established its largest embassy in the east in Awkir, as well as the army and its help, and it is originally present in Lebanon, and there is an American -technical, training, intelligence and intelligence presence, and sometimes hidden work is more important than apparent.

Some regain the experience of 1958 when the “Marines” forces descended on the shores of Lebanon after the revolution against President Camille Chamoun, and this indicates Lebanon’s strategic importance for Washington, but today it is already present in politics and on the ground, and there is an American general who heads the armistice monitoring committee, and thus expanding the presence is possible at any moment and mortgage the sign and administration of the American president, and all the possibilities are open, and the game is greater in the region Iran decided to enter suicide fighting with its arms.

The post Does “Marines” reach the shores of Lebanon? appeared first on 961 tobay Lebanon today.