Berri did not violate the internal system or the provisions of the constitution

“Kuwaiti News” wrote: pending what the discussions will lead to to control the rhythm of the next stage related to the election law. Is the failure of the Speaker to respond to the demand calling for discussing amendments to the current election law and putting it on the agenda of the General Assembly, beyond the internal system of the House of Representatives? What if the extension occurred to Parliament?

In the context, the constitutional and legal expert, Dr. Adel Yamin, pointed out in an interview with “Kuwaiti News” that “the provisions of Article 109 of the internal system of the House of Representatives that say: The Speaker of the Council may present to the General Assembly a project or proposal of a repetitive expedited law in the first session he will hold, even if it is not included in the agenda, which means that there is a discretionary validity of the Speaker of the Council to subtract or not to offer if it is not included in the agenda. This authority is optional, since the phrase came to the president, that is, the Speaker of the Council and not to the president, meaning that it came in the form of the option and not obligatory, and this leads to the saying that the Speaker of the Council is free to present or not present the proposal of the expedited expedited law on the public body when it is not within the terms of the agenda. For a group of deputies or a majority, and not bound by any petition signed in this direction. ”