The Minister of Defense statement reveals the fragmentation of the political decision and the transgression of the constitution

Maarouf Al -Daouk wrote in “Major General”: What the National Defense Minister Michel Mansi came out from the impression of his statement, after the provocative incident of Hezbollah by lighting the rock of Al -Raoucheh, and contrary to the decision to prevent and the pledges that he made to the state not to do this, it reflects differences and contrasts between the components of power, and overwhelming the constitution, and the multiplicity of the reference of the political decision in it, which indicates that it indicates unnecessary repercussions On the course of the state and its advancement, especially in this difficult and criminal stage, if it is not contained, and things will be returned to its quorum in unifying the decision, respecting the constitution and managing the authority.

Minister Mansi considered that the protesters to break the prestige of the state, and those who wonder about the role of the security forces and the Lebanese army, who are officials and citizens in preventing what happened, but they receive the consequences of the street on the legitimacy of legitimacy, and the fold behind small justifications, to disavow the great responsibilities, but he did not dare naming them in the name, describing the behavior of these people of beautiful and unjust prejudice to the army, which is the basic national mission Wathing strife and deterring the abuse of civil peace and consolidating national unity.
The Minister of Defense statement is the least of what is said to contradict himself, and to turn the facts, when it is considered an inquiry and objection to the incident of breaking the prestige of the state, and its dissatisfaction with what happened, that it has prejudiced the army and questioning its role and its tasks in preserving legitimacy, and this is absolutely not true, because these are in their entirety, more keen on the army and its national role than others, while the minister is observed about the violations And the threat of civil peace, the excitement of sectarian and sectarian strife, the rebellion against the state’s decisions, and the insult to the role of the army and security forces, as if they did not cause provocation, fuel the popular and political atmosphere, and to weaken the state and its prestige.
More than that, the Minister of Defense ignored the presence of the government, which is a minister in it by saying, “The army has a home to protect it, a president who takes care of him and a leader who watches over him and a people who loves him, and in it a clear constitutional violation, as if the army belongs to the presidency of the republic, and not to the government’s decisions as the procedural authority under the constitution, and does not comply with its decisions, and this is a dangerous indication of the fragmentation of the political decision within the state and the harmony of power between them The most dangerous impact on making and implementing the important decisions to remove Lebanon from its multiple crises.
The defense minister was to present his observations and criticisms that he included in his statement, at the Cabinet table, to discuss it and receive answers to it, instead of issuing a statement, his echoes were negative inside, and it is feared that its repercussions will be harmful as well, unless a statement or positions refute the components of this statement and emphasize the harmony between the pillars of power.