Exclusive weapon is the first victims of the Raouche Rock

What happened Thursday in the scene of the lighting of the Rawsha Rock with the photos of the two master Hassan Nasee.

And if one wants to analyze the mind and logic and in a careful reading of what happened in the hours that preceded this celebration, the positions of both parties can be listed, if we are allowed to use the term “party” on the head of the executive authority in the country.
The problem started when Hizbullah declared through his media circle that it was intended to establish a mass event in exchange for the Raouche Rock on the first anniversary of the martyrdom of the two former years. This event includes lighting the rock of Raouche with pictures of the two martyrs.
Opponents of the use of Rash Rock for partisan and personal purposes, which are a public facility, consider that “Hizbulza” intends to light the rock for partisan purposes for goals that are no longer hidden from anyone, and if those close to it confirm that any Lebanese has the right to establish any effectiveness in the place that he deems appropriate with the symbolism of the event, and this is what the constitution guarantees in terms of freedom of movement and gathering in any region of Lebanon The laws in force.
These opponents add that he was the possibility of “Hezbollah” to avoid all this problem with the establishment of this event in any Lebanese region, including the region in which the demonstrators gathered, after obtaining the ear of the assembly by the relevant authorities, and he also had to not challenge the “other parties” of the people of Beirut, who considered that the lighting of the rock for partisan purposes contradicts the symbolism of this Beirut rock. It may only be used on national occasions. If every party wanted to light the rock as it likes, the issue would turn into something like a unpleasant farce.
If the intention of the organizers of this event was clear, as these opponents say, they would not have insisted on challenging a decision issued by the Lebanese Prime Minister, and they lit the rock as if they wanted to say to the Prime Minister of Lebanon, “Rather, your decision and the drinking of Momo”, especially since they know about the previous perception and determination that breaking the decision of the prime minister considered by some as a break of the will of the sect, to which this president belongs in accordance with the positions of the positions. The first three main in the country on both Maronites, Shiites and Sunnis.
This is on the one hand, but the organizers of this event have another point of view that it was that Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who is the head of the government of all of Lebanon, had to behave from a national position, and not from a sectarian position, and therefore he had to understand the feelings of the supporters of “Hizbah” in such a traumatic anniversary, which means a lot to them in their jihadi conscience, and he was on him being the first in charge of the executive authority to avoid the issuance of a circular in which this environment saw this environment. For her feelings and challenge her will.
These organizers add that it was very easy to avoid all this problem if the prime minister had behaved as a state man, but instead entrusted his circular, who was not implemented as an expression of a political position, by another decision in which he asked the relevant ministers to give their instructions to the agencies affiliated with their ministries to arrest all those who participated in lighting the rock of the Raouche, defying government decisions. President Salam was not satisfied with this, adding these, but rather wanted to pour the oil on the fire when he retired from his activity as a prime minister.
In this narrative it seems that everyone is right somewhere, but at the same time they are wrong in appreciation and in dealing with matters from pure national starting points, and not according to a narrow partisan logic or according to the logic of the official, who does not see beyond his siring.
If the “hearts were full of”, Hizbullah would have taken a destination other than the rock of the Raouche to commemorate this anniversary. If the feeling was not mutual, President Salam would not have issued his circular and he would not have been forced to i’tikaaf, which is not offered or delayed in changing the general political path, and whose focus remains government decisions taken in the 5 and 7 August sessions, and in the September 5 session. It is believed that the issue of “exclusive weapon” will be the first victim of the Raouche Rock.

Related topics