Palestinian conflict regarding the Muslim arms of the army … and the Israeli position on the understanding paper is intransigent

The file of weapons in the Palestinian camps were submitted to the forefront amid a Palestinian confusion between the approval of the Palestinian Authority and the Fatah movement to hand over a weapon truck to the army in the Burj Al -Barajneh camp, and the denial of the Palestinian factions was that what happened was related to the delivery of the camps weapon.

The Palestinian factions indicated that what happened is an internal organizational matter related to the “Fatah” movement and has nothing to do with the question of the Palestinian weapon in the camps, and renewed the commitment to the Lebanese laws “and our respect for the sovereignty of the state and its institutions, and the brotherly relationship between the Palestinians and our people in Lebanon.”
But the Palestinian National Security official, Subhi Abu Arab, announced that “the weapon that was delivered to the army is not our weapon, but rather an illegal weapon.
The information stated, “The weapon that was handed over to the army is due to groups affiliated with Shadi Mahmoud Mustafa, a former official in the“ Fatah ”movement in the Burj Al -Barajneh camp, and who was separated from the movement several months ago to rebel against the decisions of the Palestinian Authority and the appendices in several judicial notes in security cases and was arrested by the army in a surprise process at the Venice Hotel.
According to the information, it is expected to receive “Fatah” in Al -Bus camp in Tire, today a similar shipment of weapons to the army. It is the outcome of an inventory carried out by a Palestinian committee that came from Ramallah.
This will follow the second stage in the Beddawi camp in the north and the Rashidiya camp in the south, to crown in the third and final stage in the Ain al -Hilweh, Al -Mia and Miyah camp in the Saida area, and the northern tower in the Tire area.
In the file of the extension of the UNIFIL forces, he learned that the issue was almost settled, after a new paragraph was introduced to the brief decision that will be issued, which included the reference to “the extension last time for a year, except if necessary and otherwise imposed,” according to the informal delegate informed by the Lebanese side.
According to diplomatic sources, the UNIFIL commander commanded a key role in this regard, and that the negotiations that are now taking place between the members of the Security Council on the renewal of the UNIFIL power are exclusively about the period of its survival.
According to the information, “the United Nations had advised Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam to send a message to the Security Council to express the will of the country to remain the UNIFIL power in the south, and the message of Lebanon without doubt is useful because no one can replace Lebanon’s mission in relation to insisting on the survival of the force.
In addition, there was nothing new in terms of the Israeli response to the American paper and the Lebanese demands in exchange for the step taken by the government with the exclusive weapon, while learning that the American envoy Thomas Barak and the former envoy Morgan Ortigos visited Israel and held discussions with Israeli officials but did not make any progress, so Barak left to Paris to join the Israeli -Syrian meetings while Ortoos remained in Israel to appeal The discussions are in an attempt to persuade Tel Aviv to make an interview step, as Barak said, with withdrawing from 3 points, or stopping the attacks at a minimum, and completing the negotiations on the rest of the American paper items.
However, political sources pointed out that the Israeli position is intransigent and did not provide any positive step and does not want to withdraw from any point nor stop the attacks before Lebanon carried out practical steps on the ground in the process of disarming Hizbullah.

Related topics