Between the rejection of Israel and Hezbollah … Lebanon is an American

Lebanon said its word. He said it to “Hizbullah. He said it to the American delegate Tom Barak. He did not“ play ”from under the table, but rather revealed his papers in front of the whole world. And what was not included in the government’s decision to limit every illegal weapon in the hands of the legitimate Lebanese powers, he informed him to Al -Thani Barak -Ortigos.

On the day the government decided to drink “the milk of the seven” she knew that “Hizbullah” would not offer to the state his weapon “at the door of the comfortable”. Despite her knowledge of what will be the reaction of “Haret Hreik”, she made it, and insisted that it not be on the Lebanese scene from Naqoura in the south to the Great River in the north, and from the coast to the eastern chain, a gun other than the gun of the expensive power alone without the other to preserve the security of citizens, whatever their partisan and sectarian affiliation And the Bekaa, whether it is the source of the Israeli essence or what is known as the extremists in Syria.
This government also knew that “Hizbullah” would find itself under the microscope of observation, internally and externally, if Israel met the move of Lebanon with another step. If her army is withdrawn from the five hills. The “party”, which adheres to its weapon on the pretext of liberating the remaining lands, will not find enough of its justifications to keep its finger on the trigger, and insist on keeping its weapon, which Iran extended to fight Israel and end all kinds of occupations.
However, Israel, as confirmed by more than one Western diplomatic source, will not respond to the Lebanese demands, which Berke and Ortugus carried with him. For herself, you will find a thousand excuses for not responding to the demand for her withdrawal from the five hills. It may be among the justifications, which Tel Aviv will give to Berk and Ortugus, that it is not confident that the Lebanese government with its own forces is able to collect the weapon of Hizbullah, which still rejects this matter with all its disruption. Among these means may be the waving of the “civil war”, whose letters were in the speech of its Secretary -General Sheikh Naim Qassem, which threatened to fabricate such a war “if necessary.”
When Israel refuses to withdraw from the five Lebanese hills, Hizbullah will meet this rejection with a greater rejection, which stipulated that he be given American and European guarantees with a complete withdrawal of the Israeli army and stopped its continuous attacks on targets that fall within Lebanese territory. If Israel does not initiate and withdraw from every inch that it occupies in the south, then “Hezbollah” will not be handed over even “Al -Owaisiya” or “Al -Qarfa”.
Between the Israeli rejection and the rejection of “Hizbullah”, “Al -Hanna and Al -Mana” are lost in its legal concept, and therefore the legitimacy represented by the government from the constitution, and the confidence of the House of Representatives, which gave it to it on the basis of its ministerial statement that included the inevitability of “confiscating” the decision “war and peace” from the hand The state for years.
If Israel refuses to meet Lebanon, even by words, with a step similar to what the government took from a decision in the 5 August session on the pretext of its lack of confidence in the capabilities of the Lebanese state to implement what it had previously decided; And if “Hezbollah” was determined to not hand over its weapon before Israel withdraws from every inch that is still in its inch, and before the prisoners and the missing are returned, and before it stopped its attacks and its daily targets, the political situation in Lebanon will remain in its place, and the state will start with its legitimate institutions gradually lose some of the prestige that it had recovered in the 5 and 7 sessions.
It may be in the universal rejections, of course, which calls for a question about whether the “Zark” of the Lebanese authority in the American corner after the game’s threads have come out of its own control circle.
With this sign, it can be said that “Hezbollah” linked its fate to what he did not mean to the fate of Israeli withdrawals, so the performance of this authority will be “supplemented” to the uninhabited and unintended “harmony” between the “party” and Israel to hit the remaining hope for the return of life to a dismantled state.